Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' long continuous casual labour service since 2004 (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. respondents deny regularization citing post-1993 engagement (Para 3) |
| 3. 1988 scheme entitles 240-day workers to temporary status (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. rejects limitation and 1993 scheme defenses for equity (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. supreme court mandates regularization for long-serving temporaries (Para 11) |
| 6. orders regularization with notional benefits within three months (Para 12 , 13) |
O R D E R
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The applicants had filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -
“i. Writ of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to regularize the services of the applicants as the applicants are serving with the respondents as Casual Labourers since 2004 and under the Policy guidelines are entitled for regularization against permanent posts as they have worked for 240 days in each year of their length of service from the date they became eligible for the same along with all consequential benefits keeping in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India have thre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
