Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Krishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compassionate claim facts and reliefs sought. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. parties' contentions on qualification rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 8) |
| 3. rules at death govern; no retrospective application. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. delay cannot prejudice; no revival of probation. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. impugned actions quashed; regularization restored. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section
19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -
a) To quash the impugned show cause notice dated 28.5.2018, A-
1, and irrelevant clause of appointment letter of 10th class as per New Rules (RR) at the time of issue of appointment as the same is not applicable being case of applicant is pending 04/10/1996 and came up for consideration 16/10/1999 as certified in the OA No. 395/JK/2009 and applicant is therefore governed by the old RR 1971 and even 2002 applicable prevailing at the time of applying for compassionate grounds i.e. 8th class qualification for the post of peon, Chow, Mazdoor for which applicant applied and claim is pending with the respondent as represented th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
