SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2207

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Mohinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
Original Application No. 223/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Veenu Gupta
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Thapa, ld. A.A.G.

Regularization of daily wagers denied post-1994 cutoff, no ongoing service, absent sanctioned vacancy; long service no equity right.

Headnote:The applicant sought quashment of rejection order under J&K Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 and SRO 64 of 1994 for regularization of daily wager engaged in 1996, release of unpaid wages, and restraint on disengagement. Facts involved continuous service claims supported by muster rolls and prior High Court directions in SWP No. 143/2009 for consideration per rules. Court found engagement post-1994 cutoff under SRO 64 ineligible applicant; no sanctioned vacancy under 2010 Act; wages released; no current engagement. Issues framed around eligibility for regularization despite long service, compliance with prior directions, and wage arrears. Ratio decidendi emphasized regularization not a recruitment mode per Supreme Court precedent; long service acquires no right absent policy fit and ongoing service; departmental lists for wages do not confer eligibility; prior dismissal in SWP No. 677/2014 binds. Original Application dismissed, upholding rejection order.

Table of Content
1. applicant's engagement and regularization claims since 1996 (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents deny eligibility under sro 64 and 2010 act (Para 3)
3. post-1994 engagement bars regularization; wages paid (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. no vacancy; uma devi precludes equity regularization (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. prior dismissal binds; policy criteria not met (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. application dismissed upholding rejection order (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application RAJAT SINGH PATHANIA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

“i, Quashment of order No. PHEJ/GE/04/E OF 2014 dated 04.01.2015 whereby the case of the petitioner for his regularisation has been rejected in a totally illegal and arbitrary manner and without any reasonable justification; it.

ii. Seeking command upon the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in the PHE Department against various posts keeping in view the length of service rendered by the petitioner, his continuous working and uninterrupted performance of duties, in reference to various Government Orders and policies of the State Government pertaining to regularisation of daily wagers/casual labourers as also under the provisions of the J&K Civil Services (Special provisions) Act, 2010;

iii. Seeking command upon the respondents to release the unpaid wages of the petitioner w.e.f. the date indicated in the body of the writ petition regularly and continuously till his services are regularized;

iv. Seeking command upon the respondents not to disband/disengage the petitioner as _ daily wager/casual labourer till his case is considered and his services are regularized; Such other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the given facts and circumstances of the case kindly be passed in favour of the applicant as against the respondents.”

2. The facts of the case as averred by the applicant in his pleadings, are as follows: -

i. The applicant belongs to District Kathua. He came to be engaged/appointed as Daily Rated Labourer in Civil as well as Mechanical Divisions of PHE Division Kathua on April, 1996.

ii. The applicant right since the date of his engagement as daily rated worker in PHE Division, Kathua is regularly performing his duties as are assigned to him by the concerned authorities. He is manning different stations of PHE and is made responsible for regular and uninterrupted supply of water in the area. The applicant is regularly and _ continuously performing his duties with utmost dedication and sincerity and has never given any chance of complaint to any of his superiors. Different muster rolls/sheets have been prepared by the respondents for the purposes of marking his attendance and release of his wages etc. iii. The respondent no. 4 in the year 2005 pursuant to letter No.SEK/1163 dated 07.07.2005 written by the Superintending Engineer, PHE, Department, Kathua vide his office Letter No. 2338-39 dated 19.07.2005 by virtue of which information was submitted regarding daily rated workers community participation workers, engaged prior to 1994 and after 1994 in the form of the lists. First list carries 23 nos. of daily wagers engaged prior to 1994 whereas the second list carries the daily wagers engaged after 1994. In the 2 list the name of the applicant appears at S. No. 50.

iv. The applicant kept on approaching the respondents for his permanent absorption / regularisation in the department on the ground of his continuous and _— uninterrupted performance of duties. However, the respondents did not make any efforts to regularise the services of the applicant except to forwarding the bio-data of the applicant to the higher authorities.

v. The fact of the matter is that the applicant has been continuously working with the respondents as daily rated worker/casual labourer right since his first engagement and to substantiate the factum of h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top