Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Anjali Bhawra, Administrative Member
Ramesh Chand Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. erroneous macp grant and pre-retirement pay revision/recovery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. prior tribunal proceedings and non-compliance with directions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 3. macp rules limit upgradation to promotional grade pay; opportunity given. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. admitted facts; correction before retirement but principles apply. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 5. no recovery from group-c retiree without misrepresentation; oa allowed. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
O R D E R
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal by way of instant O.A, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following relief:
“i) That present application may kindly be allowed;
ii) That complete records pertaining to the case in hand may kindly be summoned in the interest of justice and equity;
ⅲ) That the impugned office order dated 01.11.2017 (Annexure A-12) affirming that the orders dated 7.11.2014 (Annexure A-3) whereby the pay of the applicant was revised thereby reducing his pay from retrospective period and the order of recovery from t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
