CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R Dhanalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Ut Of Puducherry – Respondent
O.A./1298/2025
##PAGE1##
1 OA 310/01298/2025
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CHENNAI BENCH
OA/310/01298/2025
th
Dated Friday, the 30 day of January, Two Thousand and Twenty Six
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. M. SWAMINATHAN, Member (J)
&
HON'BLE MR. M.L. SRIVASTAVA, Member (A)
1. R. Dhanalakshmi
2. R.Radhika
3. B. Barathi
4. P.Kartik
5. A. David
6. D. Jegadesan
7. R. Venkatachalapathy
8. K. Balaguru
9. K. Bakya
10. K. Gnanavalli
11. K. Sankari
12. P. Padmavathi .... Applicants
By Advocate M/s. B. Balavijayan
Vs.
1. The Union of India, Represented by
Secretary to Government (Education),
Government of Puducherry,
Puducherry - 605 001.
2. The Director,
Directorate of School Education,
Perunthaliavar Kamarajar Centenary
Educational Complex,
100 Feet Road, Anna Nagar,
Puducherry - 605 005. ... Respondents
By Advocate Mr. R. Syed Mustafa
##PAGE2##2 OA 310/01298/2025
ORAL ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Member(J))
In the instant OA, the applicants seeks the following relief:
“i. to call for the records relating to the impugned
Notification issued by the 2nd respondent, vide Proceedings
No.A1818/ DSE / Estt.IV/C/2023, dated 12.09.2025, and
quash the same,
(ii) And further Direct the respondents to make
re-notification for recruitment to the post of Primary School
Teachers, duly following the Rule of Reservation, duly
adopting the employment seniority from the original date of
registration, and adopting all procedures as per the
Recruitment Rules for the post of Primary School Teachers,
and pass such further or other orders as this Tribunal deems
fit and proper and thus render justice.”
2. Brief facts of the case as submitted by the applicants are as follows:
The applicants have completed their Diploma in Teacher Training and have also
qualified in the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET). Accordingly, they are fully
eligible for appointment to the post of Primary School Teachers under the
Government of Puducherry. On 12.09.2025, the respondents issued a
notification inviting applications for direct recruitment to the post of Primary
School Teachers. A total of 190 vacancies were notified, of which 181 vacancies
pertain to the Puducherry and Karaikal regions and 9 vacancies pertain to the
Mahe region. In the impugned notification, while prescribing the age limit, the
respondents failed to give due consideration to G.O.Ms.No.50 dated 29.07.2022.
##PAGE3##3 OA 310/01298/2025
Further, the notification provides that employment exchange seniority shall be
computed from the date of registration of the TET qualification. Since TET is
only a qualifying examination and not a competitive examination, fixing
seniority based on TET registration is arbitrary and contrary to the rule of law.
The impugned notification has also completely omitted the Meritorious Sports
Person (MSP) quota under the horizontal reservation category. Additionally, the
rules of reservation, both vertical and horizontal, have not been properly
followed in the recruitment process. Thus, the impugned notification issued by
the respondents is unconstitutional, arbitrary, and violative of the established
rules of reservation. The last date for submission of online applications is
14.10.2025. Hence, the present Original Application is filed challenging the
impugned notification.
3. When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the
applicants submitted that the impugned notification dated 12.09.2025, issued
for recruitment for the post of Primary School Teachers deprives the right of
eligible and qualified candidates. The procedures adopted, the categories under
which the recruitment is done, the rule position adopted, the rule of reservation
followed, the region wise priority given, are all in total controversy and in
complete violation of the basic recruitment rules prescribed for Primary School
Teachers. It is further submitted that the respondents have failed to consider the
age-relaxation provided under G.O. Ms. No. 50 dated 29.07.2022 while fixing
the upper age limit.
##PAGE4##4 OA 310/01298/2025
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.