SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2317

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Anjali Bhawra, Administrative Member
Kewal Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A.No. 060/725/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dharam Singh
For the Respondents: Ms. Swati Arora

Upgraded pay scales for Inspectors/Superintendents notionally effective from 01.01.1996 (5th CPC date), actually from 21.04.2004 order date, ensuring parity with other departments and correcting anomaly with arrears and pension benefits.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act - Section 19 - Service law - Pay scales - Upgradation of pay scales for Inspectors and Superintendents in revenue departments - 5th Central Pay Commission recommendations effective from 01.01.1996 - Government order dated 21.04.2004 granting upgraded pay scales prospectively - Applicant sought notional fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 on actual basis as granted to counterparts in other departments like Railways Accounts, citing parity and judicial precedents - Tribunal held that parity between cadres in revenue departments and others accepted, granting notional benefits w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual from 21.04.2004 with arrears and consequential pension benefits. (Paras 3, 4, 16, 19)

(B) Pay parity - Principle of equal pay for equal work - Anomaly in pay scales corrected notionally from date of 5th CPC - Discriminatory treatment by restricting benefits to later date rejected - General practice of notional fixation from revision date followed where upgradation allowed later - No interference where duties and responsibilities comparable across departments. (Paras 6, 13, 17)

Facts of the case:
Retired Assistant Commissioner, initially joined as Inspector on 30.10.1987, promoted to Superintendent on 29.08.1997, retired on 31.07.2016 - Prior to 5th CPC, pay scales Rs.1640-2900 (Inspectors) and Rs.2000-3500 (Superintendents) - 5th CPC recommended Rs.5500-9000 and Rs.6500-10500 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 - Upgraded to Rs.6500-10500 and Rs.7500-12000 w.e.f. 21.04.2004 - Other departments granted notionally w.e.f. 01.01.1996 - Challenged restriction to 21.04.2004.

Findings of Court:
O.M. dated 21.04.2004 quashed to extent of prospective effect - Entitled to upgraded pay scales notionally w.e.f. 01.01.1996, actually w.e.f. 21.04.2004, with arrears of pay/pension within three months.

Issues: Whether upgraded pay scales under O.M. dated 21.04.2004 entitled notionally from 01.01.1996; applicability of parity with other departments; consequential benefits including pension revision.

Ratio Decidendi: Parity in pay scales accepted between revenue cadres and comparable posts in other departments; notional fixation from 01.01.1996 standard practice for anomaly removal; judicial precedents binding; no valid reason for discriminatory later date.

Result: Original Application partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of service and pay scale revisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. applicant's claim for retrospective pay upgrade from 1996. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. respondents' defense on no anomaly and parity denial. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. prior tribunal and court rulings on notional pay benefits. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. supreme court approval of 1996 notional pay parity. (Para 17 , 18)
6. directions for notional pay fixation from 01.01.1996. (Para 19 , 20)

ORDER

Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):

1. The present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act is directed against the letter dated 21.04.2004 to the extent it granted upgraded pay scale w.e.f. 21.04.2004 instead of 1.1.1996 on actual basis. Applicant has prayed for relief as under:

"i) That the impugned letter/OM. dated 21.04.2004 (Annexure A-1) to the extent it granted up-graded pay scale w.e.f. 21.04.2004 instead of 01.01.1996 on actual basis be quashed and set aside.

ii) That the impugned letter dated 25.07.2023(Annexure A-2 ) and office order dated 21.11.24(A—3) denying upgraded /enhanced pay scales to the superintendents and inspectors on actual basis w.e.f.1.1.1996 also be quashed and set aside.

iii) That it be declared that the applicant is entitled to pay scale of Rs. 6500- 10,500/- w.e.f. 1.1.1996 on actual basis as inspector ,to pay scale of Rs.7500-12000 w.e.f. the date of joining as superintendent (instead of from 21.04.2004) with all consequential benefits like arrears of pay/pension and allowances etc. at each stage/event during and after service as applicable to the applicant .

iv) That a direction be issued to the respondents to extend benefit of judgment rendered by the Hon ‘ble Principal Bench in OA. No. 763 of 2015, decided on 3.2.2022 , Judgment passed bv the Hon ‘ble Delhi High Court in WP. No. 1523/2016. decided on 18.12.2019. Judgment dated 3.1.25 in SLP.(C) D.No. 51350/2024(A-14), judgement dated 3.1.11(AnnexureA-15) ,9.9.24 in SLP(C) NO.2944/2024(Annexure A7 13) arising out of O.A.154/2015(A-11) and DBCWP 16035/2022(A-12) /W.P. 5096/2009 (A-15) SLP(C) NO. 26615/2011(A-16) r/W. R.P.(C)2636/2018 (A-17) and order dated 3.7.2025 in CA. NO. 577/2022 of Allahabad Tribunal(A-10) to the applicants and to pass order modifying last para of impugned order dated 21.04.2004 stating that orders shall take effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis when the recommendations of 5Lh CPC became operational.

v) to direct the respondents to allow the applicant to have the benefit of, “option” for fixation purpose under para F.R. 22(1) (a),

vi) to direct the respondents to make payments of the differences in pay ,pension and applicable allowances resulting in increase as result of re- fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 as inspector and w.e.f.29.8.1997 as superintendent till the actual payment is made with interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum.

vii) To direct the respondents to revise the pension, issue revised PPO and to pay the difference with interest along with other pensionary benefits as applicable to the applicant.

viii) Any appropriate direction this Hon’ble Tribunal deem fit.”

2. Factual matrix of the case is as follows. The applicant initially joined service in the respondent department as an Inspector on 30.10.1987, and promoted as Superintendent on 29.08.1997. The applicant retired on 31.07.2016 from CGST Commissionerate Ludhiana.

3. Prior to the 5 Central Pay Commission (CPC), the Inspectors and Superintendents working in the respondent department were granted the pay scales of Rs. 1640-2900/- and Rs. 2000-3500/- respectively. The 5% CPC recommended the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000/- and Rs. 6500-10500/- for Inspectors and Superintendents respectively w.e.f. 01.01.1996. Vide impugned O.M. dated 21.04.2004 (Annexure A-1), the pay scales in the cadre of Inspectors and Superintendents were revised to Rs. 6500-10500/- and Rs. 7500-12000/- respectively w.e.f. 21.04.2004 in both CBDT (Income Tax) and CBEC (excise and C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top