Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member
Rajesh Kumar Chopra – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and promotion to superintendent grade-ii (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. reversion order issued and stayed; retirement as superintendent (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. pension as vested right; estoppel against reversion post-retirement (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. respondents defend reversion validity and pension on lower post (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. pension office acts per parent department's retirement post designation (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. core issue: pension basis on actual retirement post despite reversion (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. supreme court precedent: pension on last pay drawn till superannuation (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. quash ppo; grant benefits on superintendent post with arrears (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
O R D E R
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. The present Original Application filed under S ection 1 9 o f t he Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is directed against t he i naction o f t he respondents in not releasing the pension and other p ensionary b enefits as per the superannuation order dated 31.08.2020 ( Annexure A -2) wherein the applicant has been retired as Superintendent G rade-II b ut vide PPO (Annexure A-1) the applicant has been granted p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
