SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 16251

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M/o Urban Development – Appellant
Versus
G Santhanakrishnan – Respondent


CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH M.A.No.594/2025 in RA No. 28/2025 in OA No.756/2019 Dated, the 8th day of October, Two Thousand Twenty Five CORAM :

HON’BLE MR.M.SWAMINATHAN, MEMBER (J)

&

HON’BLE MR.SANGAM NARAIN SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (A)

1. Union of India rep by The Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi

2. The Director General, General Public Works Department (CPWD), Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi

3. The Special Director General CPWD, Rajaji Bhawan, Besant Nagar, Chennai. … Applicants By Advocate Mr. M. Kishore Kumar, SPC Vs G. Santhanakrishnan @ G.S. Krishnan Executive Engineer (Retired), No.207, MIG, LH1, Ambedkar Street, Maraimalainagar, Kancheepuram District. … Respondents By Advocate Dr. P. S. Vijayakumar ORDER BY CIRCULATION (Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr.M.Swaminathan, Member(J))

The respondents in OA No.756/2019 have filed MA 594/2025 to condone the delay of 140 days in filing the Review Application and the unnumbered Review application is filed by the respondents in the OA under Rule 17 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987 and is dealt with under Section 22(3) (f) of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, read with Rule 24 of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top