SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2335

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. Haripal, Judicial Member, Braj Mohan Agrawal, Administrative Member
Sheejamol Santhosh – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent
Original Application



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K.P.S. Suresh, Mr. Varghese John, Mrs. Reena Sharon Suresh
For the Respondents: Mr. T.V. Ajayakumar, Mr. Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Mr. Elvin Peter P.J., Mr. K.R. Ganesh, Mr. Thampan Thomas, Mr. B.V. Joy Sankar, Ms. Rajasree, Mr. Shafik M. Abdulkhadir, Mr. V. Sajith Kumar, Mr. Godwin Joseph, Mr. Vivek A.V., Mrs. Sreekala T.N, Mr. R. Sreeraj, Mr. B. Raghunathan, Mr. M. Salim, Mr. R. Srinath, Dr. Stanly Chazhoor, Mr. K. Jaladharan, Mr. V.M. Jacob, Mr. P. Sanjay, Mr. Biju Meenattoor, Mr. Paul Varghese, Mr. Kiran Narayanan, Mr. Rahul Raj, Ms. Amrutha M. Nair

Employees transferred on own request to new region under IRT policy with undertaking forego original seniority and rank junior-most, per regional cadre rules; DoPT absorption guidelines inapplicable to direct recruits.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Inter Regional Transfer - Seniority fixation - Nursing Officers initially recruited as direct recruits in different regions, transferred to receiving region on own request under Inter Regional Transfer Policy (IRT) - Policy explicitly provided transferees placed at bottom of base cadre in new region, with undertaking to that effect - DoPT OM 2010 para 3.5 on seniority of absorbees without deputation not applicable to direct recruits under regional cadre - Transfers on own request do not carry original seniority to avoid disturbing existing employees' rights - High Court judgment on state service absorbees inapplicable. (Paras 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12)

(B) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Limitation - Challenge to IRT policy clauses after decade of availing benefits and seniority list issuance barred by delay; cannot disturb settled positions. (Para 12(i))

(C) Transfer on own request - Employee foregoes pre-transfer seniority; placed below junior-most in new cadre as per service rules and public interest rationale. (Para 9 quoting Civil Appeal No.4356 of 2025)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, nursing officers working in specified hospitals, initially recruited as staff nurses in other regions, sought and obtained inter-regional transfers to receiving region on own request per IRT policy notifications, signing undertakings to rank junior-most in base cadre. Aggrieved by final seniority list placing them en masse below juniors of that year, challenged policy clauses inconsistent with DoPT guidelines and sought recasting of seniority from original joining dates.

Findings of Court:
IRT policy clauses valid; para 3.5 DoPT 2010 inapplicable; claim time-barred; no merit in disturbing regional seniority of direct recruits post voluntary transfer with undertaking.

Issues: (a) Maintainability assailing IRT policy after decade; (b) Applicability of DoPT 2010 para 3.5; (c) Applicability of High Court judgment on absorbees.

Ratio Decidendi: Transferees on own request under regional cadre policy with undertaking lose original seniority, placed at bottom to protect existing employees; DoPT absorption rules inapplicable to direct recruits; delayed challenge after availing benefits not maintainable.

Result: Original Application dismissed. No order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. parties and respondents listed in oa (Para 1)
2. applicants challenge loss of seniority post irt (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. reliefs seek quashing irt policy parts (Para 5)
4. respondents defend irt undertaking and policy (Para 6)
5. party respondents estopped by irt undertaking (Para 7)
6. claims time-barred; dopt inapplicable (Para 8)
7. sc: request transfers lose seniority (Para 9)
8. some respondents support applicants (Para 10)
9. issues: maintainability, dopt, hc applicability (Para 11)
10. oa dismissed; irt policy upheld (Para 12)

O R D E R

Per: Mr. Braj Mohan Agrawal, Administrative Member

Applicants are Nursing Officers, working in ESIC Hospitals in Kerala who were initially recruited as Staff Nurses in different States, other than Kerala and later on took inter regional transfer and joined ESIC hospitals in Kerala on their own request in terms of Inter Regional Transfer Policy (IRT), Annexure A-6 and Annexure A-7. The applicants submit that in response to Annexure A-1 notification and an earlier circular, the applicants submitted their willingness and request for transfer to the Kerala region. Their Inter Regional Transfer requests were granted by respondents. However, as per the then existing practice the Respondent No.1 considered all such transfers as one on 'own request'. Though the migrants from State Service have succeeded in getting their seniority as a result of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala decision in OP(CAT) No. 17, 51, 157 and 183 of 2020 (Annexure A-2) Applicants who are from the same organisation, i.e. ESIC were placed en-masse at the bottom most position in the seniority list of Staff Nurses in the particular year of Kerala region. This in turn has resulted in loss of many years of seniority. Such arbitrary assignment of seniority by placing the applicants en-masse below the junior most recruits of that particular year (in receiving region i.e. Kerala) has efffectively sabotaged the right/chance of applicants from reaching the eligibility/zone of consideration for promotions.

2. The applicants contend that they were prompted to apply for the transfers as the Respondent Corporation has invited applications from the eligible candidates for Inter Regional Transfers(IRT). When their applications were accepted by ESIC, all applicants on inter regional transfer were straightway absorbed in their posts of Staff Nurses in the new region, Kerala. No cadre change, except the change of region is envisaged here. They were not on any adhoc or deputation service in Kerala. In other words,it is a case of transfer on absorption. As such, and based on the DoPT guidelines contained in Annexure A- 3, they should have been granted the seniority w.e.f. their original date of joining in the cadre, no matter to which region they were originally recruited/joined or later transferred

3. The applicants further contend that according to the latest DoPT order/policy of 2010 (Annexure A-3, para 3.5), the employees so transferred from one region to another do not have to lose their original seniority. Their seniority is to be counted from the date of their original appointment/joining in the cadre irrespective of the region from/to which the transfer has taken place. Post 2010, DoPT has evolved a view that there is an explicit public interest in every transfer, even if it is made on own request. Thus, the part of Inter Regional Transfer policies of ESIC beyond 2010, dealing with seniority of transferees to a new region, is not in conformity with the DoPT directives. Even the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala (Annexure A2) has held that the DOPT directives of 2010 on seniority should find its relevance while deciding inter-se seniority and other related matters. The Respondents have overlooked these guidelines of DoPT, as a result, the applicants have lost their seniority. They are eligible for seniority from the date of their original entry into the cadre.

4. Aggrieved, by the final seniority list date 08.11.2021 (Annexure A-5), which assign

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top