SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2351

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manoj Bihari – Appellant
Versus
Railway – Respondent
O.A./74/2017



CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA OA/050/00074/2017 Reserved on: 16.01.2026.

Pronounced on: 20.02.2026.

CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER (J)

HON’LE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER (A)

1. Manoj Bihari son of Late Banke Bihari Karn, resident of Flat No.

302, Shyam Palace, near Singh Petrol Pump, Baily Road, Patna, Post office Veterinary College, Police station-Rukunpura, District Patna.

2. Amar Singh son of Late Ram Vilash Singh resident of Flat No.

102, Vilash Residency, Manna Sigh Lane, North S. K. Puri, Post Office Pataliputra, Police Station- Shree Krishnapuri, District Patna 800013.

3. Asha Prasad son of Late Ram Krishna Prasad resident of Aryasamaj Road, S.K. Puram, Lane No. 16, Baily Road, Patna, Post Office and Police Station- Danapur, District- Patna.

4. Smt. Rita Sinha wife of Late Birendra Kumar resident of 301 B, Basudev Palace, Ranjan Yadav Path, Baily Road, Post Office and Police Station- Rupaspur, District Patna.

……. Applicants.

By Advocate(s): - Shri Goutam Bose, Sr. Advocate.

Shri K.P. Singh.

-Versus-

1. Union of India through its General manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Post Office and Police Station Hajipur, District Vaishali.

2. The General Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Hajipur, Post Office and Police Station Hajipur, District Vaishali.

3. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur.

4. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Danapur.

5. The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur.

6. The Senior Divisional Operating Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur.

…….Respondents.

By Advocate(s):- Shri Kumar Sachin.

Digitally O R D E R Per: Kumar Rajesh Chandra Member (A)

Present OA has been filed by the applicants for the following reliefs:-

“(8.1) Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit this application, issue notice to show cause as to why the applicants be not granted the benefit of Grade Pay of Rs.4600 and 4800 under the MACP Scheme and after hearing the parties your Lordships may further be pleased to direct the respondents to extend the benefit of Grade pay of Rs.4600 and 4800/- in favour of the applicants as was granted to their counter parts setting aside the order impugned dated 12.07.2016 whereby and whereunder applicants have been denied benefit of grade pay under MACP scheme.

(8.2) Your Lordships may further be pleased to direct the respondents to compute and pay the applicants their retrial benefits taking into consideration of Grade Pay of Rs.4600 and 4800/- as was given to their counter parts setting aside the orders impugned dated 12-07-2016.

(8.3) Any other order/ orders, relief/reliefs as your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Brief facts of the case as emerged from the pleadings are that the applicants namely Sri Manoj Bihar, Sri Amar Singh, Sri Prem Sagar Prasad & Late Birendra Kumar were initially appointed as Goods Guard in the year 1974, 1975 and 1976 respectively. They were posted as Guard ‘B’ in the Pay Scale Rs.330-560/-. Subsequently they were promoted to the post of Passenger Guard and thereafter Guard Mail Express in the Pay Scale of Rs. 1400-2600/- which was later revised in the pay scale of Rs. 5000-8000/- in the 5th CPC and finally the said pay scale was merged to the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000/-

3. Applicant Nos. 1,2, and 3 and later on husband of applicant no. 4 approached this Tribunal through O.A. Nos. 141,140, 241 and 146 Digitally of 2014 respectively seeking direction to the concerned Authority/respondents to extend the benefit under the Modified Assured Progression Scheme (M.A.C.P. Scheme) as was given to their counter parts working under Mugalsarai Division of the East Central Railway in-terms of Judgments rendered by the Hon'ble C.A.T., Allahabad which was affirmed by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court. The O.A. No. 146/2014 was disposed of with direction to respondents to examine the case of the applicant treating the O.A as his representation an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top