CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Judicial Member, Sumeet Jerath, Administrative Member
Rajesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' personal details listed. (Para 1) |
| 2. delay in delhi dpc due to litigation. (Para 2 , 11 , 13 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 3. retrospective promotion for dpc delays. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. natural justice mandates hearing. (Para 8) |
| 5. no review without statutory power. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. review dpc corrects retrospective promotion. (Para 12 , 14 , 16) |
| 7. withdrawal violates natural justice. (Para 17 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. restore notional promotion benefits. (Para 24) |
| 9. oa allowed, no costs. (Para 25) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J):
Brief facts of the case are that the applicants were serving as Inspectors in the Department and became eligible for promotion to the post of Superintendent. While in other Zones of the Department across the country the Departmental Promotion Committees were convened in a timely manner and eligible officers were promoted, in the Delhi Zone there was a delay in holding the DPC. Owing to this delay, the applicants were not considered for promotion at the appropriate time. Subsequently, notional promotion with retrospective effect was granted so as to align their seniority with the vacancy year. Promotion from Superintendent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.