Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Bharat Bhushan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges deputation orders without consent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents defend deputation per regulations, distinguish prior case. (Para 3) |
| 3. no rank/pay loss; routine intra-ut deputation upheld. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. article 52-c mandates no prior consent; departmental opinions confirm. (Para 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. prior case distinguished; no malafides, administrative need valid. (Para 10 , 11 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. application dismissed; orders legal. (Para 22) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -
a) The petitioner respectfully prays that this Government Order No. rejection order i.e. impugned Government Order No. 553- Home of 2025 dated 20th November, 2025 passed by the non- applicant No.1 in the representation of the applicant and against the impugned order dated 15.04.2025 issued by non- applicant No. 1 pursuant to which the applicant was deputed to Prisons Department from JKAP-7th Battalion Security unmindful of the fact that the Govt. cannot enforce deputation of an em
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
