Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, Rajinder Kashyap, Administrative Member
Ankit Dhama – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Police Through Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's application, selection, non-reporting due to army policy. (Para 2) |
| 2. non-attributable delay justifies joining despite retirement. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. repeated non-reporting warrants candidature cancellation. (Para 5) |
| 4. ex-servicemen rules require full service completion before joining. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. no right to appointment from vacancies post non-compliance. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. RajinderKashyap, Member (A):
By filing the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:-
"1. To quash and set aside the Orders dated 28.1.2025 and 27.3.2025 and direct the respondents to allow the applicant to join the post of Constable (Ex.) in Delhi Police with all consequential benefits.
2. To award costs in favor of the applicant and pass any order or orders, which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem just & equitable in the facts & circumstances of the case.”
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. Facts, as stated by the applicant, are as under:-
2.1 The applicant joined the office of the respondent No.4 i.e. Indian Army on 13.10.2003. The respondent No.3 issued Recruitment Advertisement-2023
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
