Reserved CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, JABALPUR BENCH CIRCUIT SITTINGS:INDORE Original Application No.201/00739/2019 Jabalpur, this Friday, the 20^th day of February, 2026 HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MS MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER Mohmmad Farook S/o Mohd. Kamar Age 63 years 59, Sailana Yard, Arzoo Cottage Near Masjid Ratlam (M.P.) 457 001 -Applicant (By Advocate –Shri R D Pal)

V e r s u s Union of India & others Represented by

1. General Manager, Western Railway Head Quarter Office Churchgate, Mumbai 4000 20 RAJU NA L M D DDJSMe9edgRLDF a 11aem o o h iN e a a g b 228c c x u a t d a :i e a 8 a i 5ce t b s t h i aC : l l 0 4 t d c o h . p P i y l c o2 = 1 a 5 n au y a D o f n0 8 e I 8 : s r d N m s :2F , P 8 c 6 h I 5 i , 2 6 S 2 0 g r ,a 2 R N a O c . 2c n = Cm 6 0 d 1 e a 1f e=M 4 2 a N e 4 a g f dP t 4 . 7c a s h 2= d2 a 8d e a b h d e b e4 R r 6c r 1 y h 4 r s AI Aa bd 1 e n y 1 o V R u a 33 0 J 0 a d c n e d t 0 U A : 2a i 6 h 0 a a P r h a11 J Le s o 9 l a f r, 3 U 24 i 6 r 6 : a o N r P 0 1 b8 0 L 2 o td n a 4 f A b o 2 9 0 f e e : N l + c s 0 M, , f t , s 2 1 h 0 tA 0 E Ah S a 0 D 9 i 5 4 M s , = l n 2 E5 c C E ' " 3 S c d 4 d e 1 , D R O o 0 h hT . o 9 8 T E 3 I d ' i u A R c 5 dy = . eO w 0 u a 0 3L 9 E= m p 2 9 a N 1 E4 a 0 6 ,3 e U 8 T r 4 6 J6 n 2 i M = 3 a 8 2 , t 0 " @ b 6 1 P B 30 a 0 3 h E 84 l d 4 op5, R7 c nu0L =7 7er,= 6 9= 5 5 2 D . i v D i i s v io is n io al n O al f R fic a e il , M Do an - a B g a e t r t , i , W R e a s tl t a e m rn 4 R 5 a 7 i l 0 w 0 a 1 y EO - Respondents (By Advocate –Shri P K Jain)

O R D E R BY JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JM;

The applicant in this O.A. is aggrieved against the Pension payment order dated 29.01.2019 issued by respondent No. 1. Further the applicant is seeking direction to the respondents to pay all arrears of revision of pension and all the consequential benefits with interest.

2. The facts of the case is that the applicant was working as Goods Driver Mechanical Department under the control of Respondent No. 2.

The applicant was retired on 21.12.2005. At the time of retirement the applicant was working in the pay scale of Rs. 5000-8000. The applicant in fact was drawing pay Rs, 6200/-(6200+55% Running allowance & 50% D.A. Merger) at his pay fixation in 5th Central Pay the time of retirement. The pay fixation of the applicant was required to be done in 7^th Pay Commission as per PPO issued on 18.12.2007, but it is evident from the PPO issued on 29.01.2019 in which pay of applicant Rs. 14415/- for fixation of pension has not taken into account in grade Rs. 5000-8000/-. As per rule the last drawn pay was maximum of scale Rs. 8000/-and not Rs. 5000/- as the applicant is from the category of running staff. The running staff are entitled to count 55% mileage RAJU NA L M D DDJSMe9edgRLDF a 11aem o o h iN e a a g b 228c c x u a t d a :i e a 8 a i 5ce t b s t h i aC : l l 0 4 t d c o h . p P i y l c o2 = 1 a 5 n au y a D o f n0 8 e I 8 : s r d N m s :2F , P 8 c 6 h I 5 i , 2 6 S 2 0 g r ,a 2 R N a O c . 2c n = Cm 6 0 d 1 e a 1f e=M 4 2 a N e 4 a g f dP t 4 . 7c a s h 2= d2 a 8d e a b h d e b e4 R r 6c r 1 y h 4 r s AI Aa bd 1 e n y 1 o V R u a 33 0 J 0 a d c n e d t 0 U A : 2a i 6 h 0 a a P r h a11 J Le s o 9 l a f r, 3 U 24 i 6 r 6 : a o N r P 0 1 b8 0 L 2 o td n a 4 f A b o 2 9 0 f e e : N l + c s 0 M, , f t , s 2 1 h 0 tA 0 E Ah S a 0 D 9 i 5 4 M s , = l n 2 E5 c C E ' " 3 S c d 4 d e 1 , D R O o 0 h hT . o 9 8 T E 3 I d ' i u A R c 5 dy = . eO w 0 u a 0 3L 9 E= m p 2 9 a N 1 E4 a 0 6 ,3 e U 8 T r 4 6 J6 n 2 i M = 3 a 8 2 , t 0 " @ b 6 1 P B 30 a 0 3 h E 84 l d 4 op5, R7 c nu0L =7 7er,= 6 9= 5 5 allowance. It is a part for pay fixation of pension, but the respondents EO have incorrectly shown pay Rs. 5000/-. On this basis further pay fixation in 6th Pay Commission also required to be done in pay scale of Rs. 9300-34800/- Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/-. On this basis the pay comes Rs. 19080/- whereas respondents shown pay Rs. 1881