Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Judicial Member, Mallika Arya, Administrative Member
Pratishtha Kulshreshtha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of mutual complaints: harassment vs. student misconduct. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. rejoinder challenges inquiry delays and procedures. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. icc and external committees found complaint baseless. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. false complaints warrant disciplinary action under posh act. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
O R D E R
By Mallika Arya, AM:
Through this Original Application, the applicant is seeking quashment of charge memorandum dated 03.04.2025 (Annexure A/1) and order dated 04.03.2026 (Annexure A/2). She is further seeking directions to the respondents for a fresh and fair inquiry regarding her sexual harassment complaint with a direction to the respondents to strictly comply with the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court in W.A. No. 723/2025 .
2. Briefly stating, the facts of the case are that the applicant was appointed as a Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Sanskrit under the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan on 21.08.2019. After completion of her probation, she was posted at PM Shri Kendriya Vidyalaya, Bhind (M.P.) (Annexure A/3). While posted at KV Bhind, the applicant was subjected to repeated acts of sexual harassment by Respondent No. 4, Mr. Ajay Kumar Saxena, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
