SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2459

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Judicial Member, Anjani Nandan Sharan, Administrative Member
Digvijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No.17 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Applicants: Shri S.J. Ishtiaque
For the Respondents: Shri Shree Prakash Rai

Sanction date of posts (20.10.2003) prior to NPS notification (22.12.2003) qualifies as 'advertised/notified' for recruitment, entitling ex-trade apprentices to switch from NPS to old pension scheme despite later call letters.

Headnote:(A) Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Office Memorandum dated 03.03.2023 (DoP&T) - National Pension System (NPS) vis-à-vis CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021) - Ex-trade apprentices appointed as semi-skilled industrial employees against posts sanctioned vide notification dated 20.10.2003 - Call letters for suitability test issued on 22.12.2003 - Applicants exercised one-time option for old pension scheme which was rejected holding call letters as 'advertisement/notification' post cut-off date - Held, date of sanction/notification of vacancies (20.10.2003) prior to NPS notification (22.12.2003) is determinative for eligibility; subsequent call letters due to holidays do not alter position - Applicants eligible for switchover to old pension scheme - Impugned rejection order quashed. (Paras 13, 15-17, 22)

(B) Service Law - Pension - Cut-off date interpretation - Internal recruitment of ex-trade apprentices based on fitness-cum-seniority - Sanction of posts and bifurcation thereof prior to 22.12.2003 constitutes 'advertised/notified for recruitment' under OM dated 03.03.2023 - Clarification dated 10.04.2023 by department affirms sanction date as relevant - Subsequent trade test/joining post 01.01.2004 immaterial. (Paras 12, 14, 18)

(C) Judicial Precedent - Coordinate bench decisions - Binding nature for uniformity and consistency - Identical facts to prior decision allowing relief; followed accordingly. (Paras 19-20)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, ex-trade apprentices working as semi-skilled industrial employees, had 50 posts sanctioned on 20.10.2003 and bifurcated on 17.11.2003. Called for suitability test on 22.12.2003 due to holidays despite earlier approval. Joined post 01.01.2004 under NPS. Exercised option under OM dated 03.03.2023 for CCS (Pension) Rules, rejected treating call letters as post cut-off notification.

Findings of Court:
Date of vacancy sanction (20.10.2003) governs eligibility. Applicants entitled to coverage under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021) with switchover to GPF-cum-pension scheme within eight weeks.

Issues: Whether sanction of posts prior to 22.12.2003 qualifies as 'advertised/notified' for recruitment under OM dated 03.03.2023 despite call letters issued on cut-off date; entitlement to old pension scheme for ex-trade apprentices joining post 01.01.2004.

Ratio Decidendi: For internal recruitments of ex-trade apprentices, date of post sanction/notification prior to NPS cut-off (22.12.2003) determines eligibility for one-time option to old pension scheme; call letters for suitability test not decisive when process initiated earlier.

Result: Original Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. parties and respondents listed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. recruitment initiated pre-2003 nps cutoff. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. sanction date determines pre-nps eligibility. (Para 6)
4. call letters post-cutoff disqualify ops. (Para 7)
5. om 03.03.2023 allows pre-nps vacancy switch. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. sanction letters 20.10.2003 as cutoff date. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
7. applicants eligible for ops switchover. (Para 17 , 18)
8. follows cat principal bench precedent. (Para 19 , 20 , 22)
9. oa allowed; grant ops benefits. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

O R D E R

By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-

Heard Shri S.J. Ishtiaque, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Shree Prakash Rai, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.

Reliefs sought by the applicants:-

2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed by the applicants, who are 23 in numbers for the following reliefs:

(i) to issue a writ order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.11.2023/29.11.2023 passed by the respondents.

(ii) to issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents to consider the applicants for KUMAR MISHRA covering under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 in place of NPS in the light of administrative Directions as well as judicial pronouncement by Hon’ble Delhi High Court and confirmation by Hon’ble Apex Court.

(ii) to issue any appropriate order/direction which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and appropriate in the present facts and circumstances of the case.

(iii) Award cost of the petition to the applicants.

Facts of the case:-

3. The brief facts as stated in the Original Application is that the applicants are the employees of Ministry of Defence, Government of India, Department of Defence, Production and working in Ordinance Equipment Factory Kanpur on different posts. The applicants being Ex- Trade Apprentices, were initially appointed through proper selection procedure, which was started in 2003 in pursuance of Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata (hereinafter referred as „OFB, Kolkata), letter No. 800/Manpower/2000-2001/A/I dated 20.10.2003, by which, the Chairman, OFB, Kolkata sanctioned 50 post of (having trade wise classification Tailor/Semi Skilled (30), Leather Process Worker /SS (03), Leather Worker Footwear Maker/SS (09), Fitter General Mechanical (05), Fitter Automobile (01) and Electrician (02). Vide Notification dated 22.12.2003, the applicants were called to appear in suitability test for appointment on respective industrial Trade on 18.01.2004. .

3.1 Thereafter, the applicants were appointed and asked to join on the post of various posts, for which they were selected after due process of law vide letters issued by competent authority in 2004. As the selection process of the applicant was started prior to implementation of New Pension Scheme i.e. 22.12.2003, the applicants are also entitled for Old Pension Scheme. The Ministry of Personnel, KUMAR MISHRA Public Grievance and Pension, Department of Pension and Pensioner‟s Welfare, New Delhi vide OM dated 03.03.2023 issued Notification, by which, all the Central Government Civil Employee, who have appointed against a post or vacancy which was advertised/notified for recruitment/appointment prior to the date of notification for the National Pension System i.e. 22.12.2003 and is covered under the National Pension System on joining on or after 01.01.2004 may be given one time option to be covered under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021).

3.2 In view thereof, the applicants submitted their one time option along with required in prescribed format for Old Pension Scheme before the cut-off date, but the respondents vide order dated 10.11.2023/24.11.2023 rejected the same. Hence, this Original Application has been filed, challenging the order dated 10.11.2023/24.11.2023.

4. On the other hand, counter reply was filed on 16.10.2024 wherein it has been stated that a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top