Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Judicial Member, Anjani Nandan Sharan, Administrative Member
Digvijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and respondents listed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. recruitment initiated pre-2003 nps cutoff. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. sanction date determines pre-nps eligibility. (Para 6) |
| 4. call letters post-cutoff disqualify ops. (Para 7) |
| 5. om 03.03.2023 allows pre-nps vacancy switch. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. sanction letters 20.10.2003 as cutoff date. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. applicants eligible for ops switchover. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. follows cat principal bench precedent. (Para 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 9. oa allowed; grant ops benefits. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
O R D E R
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Heard Shri S.J. Ishtiaque, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Shree Prakash Rai, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
Reliefs sought by the applicants:-
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed by the applicants, who are 23 in numbers for the following reliefs:
(i) to issue a writ order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.11.2023/29.11.2023 passed by the respondents.
(ii) to issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
