Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Sunil Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's qualifications and selection process completion. (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's claims of arbitrary non-appointment. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. no indefeasible right; provisional vacancies allow reduction. (Para 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. respondents' defense on panel expiry and no right. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“a. This Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order No.RRB/GKP Complaint/05 dated 3.6.2015 and to direct to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to give appointment to the applicant for the post of Diesel Assistant, on the basis of select list prepared after aptitude test and interview, in pursuance of Advertisement No. RRB/GKP/01/2006, Category No.1 (Diesel Assistants) and give consequential benefits to the applicant.
b. This Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly pass any other order, as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of this case, including the cost of this Original Application.”
2. Brief facts of this case as stated in the O.A. are that the applicant was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
