Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J
Hewanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. husband's service history and pension claim rejection. (Para 3 , 4 , 9) |
| 2. parties cite precedents on temporary status regularization. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. apex court mandates regularization scheme for casual laborers. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. tribunal/high court/sc deem temporary status as regularization. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. recent rulings affirm pension for long-serving casual employees. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. quash rejection; grant family pension to applicant. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER
Heard Shri Sarvesh , learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Vinod Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
2. The instant Original Application, Under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has been filed by the Applicant for the following reliefs:-
8. (i). Quash the impugned order dated 19.09.2023 passed by Superintendent of Post Office, Division Ghazipur, whereby, the claim of the applicant for pension is being rejected.
8 (ii) Issue a direction to the respondent-3 to release the family pension to the applicant.
8 (iii) Any other relief, which this Hon‟ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstancews of the case may be given in favour of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
