Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member, Diwakar Singh, Judicial Member
Anesh Shaik – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. joint prosecution allowed for common cause. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on antedating despite litigation delays. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. reiterated claims and record review. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. issue: effective date of affirmed absorption order. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. antedate to high court extended timeline; benefits granted. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
O R D E R Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicants have approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief(s):
i) Direction upon the respondents to impliment the order dated 22.03.2005 passed by this Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 1005 of 1998 (Anes Sheik & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors.)
ii) Direction upon the respondents to give the anti-dated appointment to the applicants and notional fixation of pay scale upto 7th May, 2018 and payments of arrears, if any.
iii) Direction upon the respondents to release the financial benefits to the legal heirs of Abdul Majid and Abdul Rashid who were the applicants in O.A. No.1005 of 1998.
iv) To pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.”
2. In respect of M.A. No. 350/00724 of 2019, L
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
