Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Judicial Member, B. Anand, Administrative Member
Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Council – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and termination sequence (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. termination stigmatic, requires inquiry if misconduct alleged (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. termination simpliciter valid for probationer without stigma (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 4. termination punitive if founded on misconduct allegations (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 5. quash termination, reinstate with consequential benefits (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr.B.Anand, Member (A):
By way of filing of this Original Application (O.A.) under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following relief(s):
“(a) Quash and set aside the impugned termination order dated 09.08.2024, being illegal, arbitrary, stigmatic and violative of the provisions of Rule 5 of the CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 as well as the principles of natural justice;
(b) Direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in service with continuity of service and all consequential benefits;
(c) Direct the respondents to pay arrears of salary an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
