SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2542

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Veera Seema Manish Naidu – Appellant
Versus
M/o Railways – Respondent


Central Administrative Tribunal Mumbai Bench, Camp at Nagpur Review Application No.2003/2020 in Original Application No.2119/2014 Date of Decision : 18th February, 2026 CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (A)

Hon’ble Shri Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)

Mrs. Veera Seema Manish Naidu Aged:47 Years, Occupation- Service, Flat No.305, Balasaheb Deoras Bldg.

No.1, Sir Bezongi Mehta Road, Opposite Gandhi Sagar Lake, Nagpur – 440 018. … Review Applicant (By Advocate Shri Devendra Mohgaonkar)

Versus

1. The General Manager, Central Railway, GM’s Office, Mumbai CST 400 001.

2. The Divl. Railway Manager, DRM’s Office, Kingsway, Nagpur – 440 001.

3. Sr. Divl. Finance Manager, Central Railway, DRM’s Office Kingsway, Nagpur – 440 001. …Review respondents (By Advocate Shri N.P. Lambat)

ORAL ORDER Per: Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (J)

The Review Applicant has filed the present Review Application under Section 17 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987 seeking review of the Order dated 01.08.2019 passed by this Tribunal in OA No.2119/2014.

2. After issuance of notice, the respondents have filed their reply to RA and contested the same. They have stated that the RA is not maintainable as th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top