SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2567

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, Judicial Member, VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, Administrative Member
Gali Babu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.020/00416/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt. K.Parvathi
For the Respondents: Sri D.Laxmi Narayana Rao, Sr.PC for CG

Right to promotion consideration exists, but actual promotion requires vigilance clearance; deferment valid pending advanced disciplinary proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - S.19 - CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - R.14 - DoPT O.M. dated 02.11.2012 - Constitution of India - Art.14, Art.16 - Promotion to Chief Engineer (Level 14) in MES - Deferment of empanelment by ACC pending vigilance clearance and disciplinary proceedings - Right to be considered for promotion is fundamental but actual promotion requires vigilance clearance - Sealed cover procedure applicable only after charge-memo issued - Pending SCN and disciplinary folders with CVC justify deferment - No violation of natural justice or Arts.14/16 where DPC considered applicant but ACC deferred due to ongoing vigilance issues. (Paras 1, 6, 11, 14, 15)

(B) Promotion - Distinction between right to consideration and actual promotion - Empanelment not a right; depends on vigilance clearance and administrative exigencies - Deferment valid if disciplinary proceedings in advanced stage pre-charge-memo. (Paras 11, 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, Superintending Engineer at Sl.No.4 in All India Seniority List, due for promotion to Chief Engineer for 2023 panel. DPC recommended, but ACC deferred vide order dt.01.07.2023 due to pending SCN dt.06.04.2019 on 2002-2004 works, disciplinary folders with MoD/CVC. Charge-memo issued post-OA on 23.10.2023; applicant retired 30.04.2025.

Findings of Court:
DPC/ACC considered applicant; deferment lawful pending vigilance clearance. No denial of right to consideration.

Issues: Whether deferment without charge-memo violates Arts.14/16; validity of withholding promotion on pending SCN/vigilance advice.

Ratio Decidendi: Actual promotion requires vigilance clearance even if DPC recommends; right limited to consideration, not empanelment where disciplinary matters pending at advanced stage.

Result: OA dismissed.

Table of Content
1. oa challenges deferment of promotion citing art.14/16 violations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on dopt om; no suspension/charge-sheet justifies promotion. (Para 3 , 4)
3. precedents distinguish consideration from actual promotion. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. charge-memo issued post-oa; vigilance clearance required pre-promotion. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. deferment valid due to advanced disciplinary stage; oa dismissed. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

ORDER

PER: HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:

a. To call for all the relevant and connected records relating to No.12/13/2023-EO(SMII), dt.1.7.2023 of the 2nd Respondent and set aside the same in so far as it relates to deferring the case of the applicant for being promoted as a Chief Engineer in Military Engineering Services (MES) in Level 14 of the Pay Matrix for the panel year 2023 as being arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to the law, binding precedents, principles of natural justice, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

b. Consequently, direct the Respondents to promote the applicant as a Chief Engineer in Military Engineering Services (MES) in Level 14 of the Pay Matrix for the panel year 2023 on and from the date on which the candidates whose promotions have been approved by the Respondents in the impugned proceedings.

c. Further declare that the applicant is entitled to all the consequential benefits of seniority, further promotion and monetary benefits that flow from out of setting aside the proceedings impugned herein in so far as the applicant is concerned and grant of the relief prayed for herein and direct release of the same with interest from the date on which they become due and payable till the date of actual payment.

And pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper by this Hon’ble Tribunal under the circumstances of the case.”

2. The facts of the case, in brief, as per the submissions of the applicant, are as follows:

i. The applicant was initially appointed, on 02.03.1990, to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer, through Combined Engineering Services Examination, 1987, conducted by the UPSC. He rose up to the level of Superintending Engineer (S.E.) and was due for retirement on superannuation on 30.04.2025. In the All India Seniority List, forwarded by the Directorate General (Personnel/E1(DPC), New Delhi, vide letter No.B/41023/AISL/SE/01 Jan 23/E1 (DPC), dt.12.01.2023, (Ann.A/2), his name has been shown at Serial No.04.

ii. The applicant was due for promotion to the next post of Chief Engineer (C.E.) for the Panel year 2023. The case of the applicant was considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC, for short) in the UPSC along with those of his juniors and his name appeared to have been recommended for promotion. Though the DPC proceedings are not out in the public domain, clearance or recommendation by the DPC would be the prerequisite for final empanelment by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC, for short).

iii. Respondent No.2, vide order, dt.01.07.2023, informed that the ACC had deferred the empanelment of the applicant for being promoted to the grade of Chief Engineer (C.E.) in the Military Engineering Service (MES) in Level-14 of the Pay Matrix, for the panel year 2023, without giving any reason or justification. By the same order, the ACC approved the empanelment of other officers, including the cases of officers who were juniors to the applicant, for the year 2023. Based on such an approval, his juniors also would be getting promotion and would be assuming the charge of the higher post, after formal issue of posting order for which the process starts immediately after issue of the empanelment order.

iv. The applicant claims to have maintained a fairly decent record of service and there was no charge me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top