Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RANJANA SHAHI, Judicial Member, LOK RANJAN, Administrative Member
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in consolidated ad hoc canteen employee oas. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior proceedings rejected regularization absent 1991 cut-off. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. long service due to judicial intervention, not voluntary retention. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. no need for non-statutory canteen posts; zero sanctioned staff. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. distinguished perennial work cases; no applicability here. (Para 13 , 19) |
| 6. no legal right to regularization; oas dismissed. (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
At the request of learned counsels for the parties, OA No. 816/2016 and OA No. 817/2016 are taken up together for disposal as common question of law and facts is involved in the aforesaid matters/OAs.
2. For the sake of convenience, brief facts of OA No. 816/2016 are taken up. The relief sought for by the applicant in the said OA is as under: -
"8.1 That by a suitable writ/order or the directions the notice dated 28/10/2016 annexed vide Annexure A/1 be quashed and set aside being arbitrary and contradictory to the rules.
8.2 That by a suitable writ/order or the direction the respondents be directed to regularize the services of the applica
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
