Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, J, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Devendra Singh Harijan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicants claimed benefits based on previous tribunal orders. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. adjudication on merits took place without resolving the laws' validity. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. the tribunal found no merit due to subsequent changes in regulations. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. final dismissal of the applications without further costs. (Para 15) |
ORDER
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
At the request of learned counsels for the parties, OA No. 779/2024, OA No. 777/2024, OA No. 780/2024, OA No. 781/2024 and OA No. 778/2024 are taken up together for disposal as common question of law and facts is involved in the aforesaid matters/OAs.
2. For the sake of convenience, brief facts of OA No. 779/2024 are taken up. The applicant has filed the present Original Application (O.A.) mainly seeking the following reliefs: -
“(i) To command & direct the respondent authorities to extent the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench Delhi of O.A. No. 3227/2011 and MA No. 2379/2011 in favour of applicant;
(ii) To command & direct the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of pay scale 5200-20200 in a grade pay of Rs. 2400/- in view of the order passed in O.A. No. 322
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
