SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2598

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mohd Farhan – Appellant
Versus
M/o Communications – Respondent


Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench: New Delhi O.A. No.437/2021 This the 23rd day of February, 2026 Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

Mohd. Farhan, S/o Late Anwar Ahmad, aged about 22 years, R/o Village and Post Dharampur District-

Bulandshahr, U.P.

…Applicant (By Advocate : Mr. Shoeb Shakeel with Mr. Raju Kumar) Versus

1. Union of India Through its Secretary Department of Telecom Services, Sanchar Bhawan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi.

2. The Chief Postmaster General Uttar Pradesh Circle, Lucknow- 226001

3. The Superintendent of Posts Bulandshahr Division …Respondents (By Advocate : Mr. Manish Kumar)

ORDER (ORAL)

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-

“1. That the respondents may be directed to appoint the applicant on compassionate grounds as per the rules;

2. That the. order of the respondent (Annexure A-1) for not recommendation of appointment may be set aside.

3. That any other benefit or relief which in the circumstances of the case deemed fit and proper be allowed to the applicant.

4. That the cost of the suit be awarded to the applicant.”

2. The brief facts of the case as na

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top