CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mohd Farhan – Appellant
Versus
M/o Communications – Respondent
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench: New Delhi O.A. No.437/2021 This the 23rd day of February, 2026 Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Mohd. Farhan, S/o Late Anwar Ahmad, aged about 22 years, R/o Village and Post Dharampur District-
Bulandshahr, U.P.
…Applicant (By Advocate : Mr. Shoeb Shakeel with Mr. Raju Kumar) Versus
1. Union of India Through its Secretary Department of Telecom Services, Sanchar Bhawan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi.
2. The Chief Postmaster General Uttar Pradesh Circle, Lucknow- 226001
3. The Superintendent of Posts Bulandshahr Division …Respondents (By Advocate : Mr. Manish Kumar)
ORDER (ORAL)
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-
“1. That the respondents may be directed to appoint the applicant on compassionate grounds as per the rules;
2. That the. order of the respondent (Annexure A-1) for not recommendation of appointment may be set aside.
3. That any other benefit or relief which in the circumstances of the case deemed fit and proper be allowed to the applicant.
4. That the cost of the suit be awarded to the applicant.”
2. The brief facts of the case as na
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.