Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suresh Kumar Batra, Member (J), Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Member (A)
Vandana Saini – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of ccl applications, rejections, dies-non, and penalties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 18) |
| 2. rival contentions on ccl rights vs. unauthorized absence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 3. framing issues for consideration. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 4. ccl not absolute; requires prior sanction, cases distinguished. (Para 20 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. procedural fairness upheld; clean hands lacking. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 28) |
| 6. application dismissed; orders lawful. (Para 29) |
ORDER
Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA MEMBER (J):-
1. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:-
i) To set aside the order passed by respondent no. 5 i.e. Superintendent of Post Offices, Ambala Division Ambala dated 06.12.2019 (Annexure A-12) and 26.03.2018 (Annexure A-18) and also order passed by respondents no. 3 i.e. The Director, Postal Service (HQ), Haryana Circle, Ambala District Ambala order dated 12.11.2021 (Annexure A-21) and further direct the respondent to grant child care leave with retrospective effect w.e.f. 18.09.2018 to the applicant and other consequential benefits.
2. The facts of the case
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
