SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2747

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pyarey Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


(Reserved on 19.02.2026)

Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad This the _25th day of _February, 2026 HON’BLE MR. RAJNISH KUMAR RAI, MEMBER-J.

HON’BLE MS. MANJU PANDEY, MEMBER-A.

Original Application No. 1602 of 2011 (U/S 19, Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985)

Pyare Lal, aged about 61 years, Son of late Chandu Ram, Resident of 59/1, Type-I, Ordnance Equipment Factory Hazratpur, Firozabad.

……….. Applicant.

By Advocate: Mr. S.K. Pandey.

Versus

1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, (Production), Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2. Director General, Ordnance Factories, Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India, Ordnance Factories Board, 10-A, Shahid Khudi Ram Bose Road, Kolkata-1.

3. General Manager, Ordnance Equipment Factory, Hazratpur Tundla, Firozabad.

4. The Principal Controller Accounts Pension (P.C.D.A. (P)), Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad.

……….. Respondents By Advocate: Mr. Vidyapati Tripathi.

Order By Hon’ble Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (Judicial)

The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for treating 30 years 02 months and 06 days as qualifying service and to quash the impugned orders passed by the res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top