ORDER

1.PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A): It is not in dispute that the applicant has been serving the department as a casual employee over a period of 25 years since 09.10.2001 uninterruptedly till date and became overaged to seek for any employment in government. Also, the respondents did not dispute the fact that 18 casual workers working in Bhubaneswar Commissionerate were regularized vide order dated 04.03.2011 and 64 similar causal workers working under Lucknow Commissionerate were also regularized vide order No. 130 dated 17.02.2025 retrospectively wef. 22.01.2010. According to the applicant/Ld. Counsel for the applicant, the applicant is also entitled to regularization and all consequential servile and financial benefits retrospectively as per the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Jaggo Vrs. Union of India and Others, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3826, Dharam Singh & Others Vs. State of U.P & Another, (Civil Appeal No.8558 of 2018, disposed of on 19.08.2025), Shripal and Anr. vrs. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 221, Bhola Nath Vs State of Jharkhand and Ors, 2026 SCC Online SC 129, Pawan Kumar Vs Union of India, 2026 INSC 156, and Full Bench of this Tribunal in