SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2797

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J, Pramod Kumar Das, A
Sri Kabir Charan Mallik – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. D.P. Dhalsamant
For the Respondents: Mr. J.K. Nayak

The appointment of employees through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) should be considered a promotion, qualifying them for benefits under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme - Claim for 3rd financial upgradation denied by respondents - The applicant claims the upgradation from the date it was due on completing 30 years of service. (Paras 1-9)

(B) Court's Jurisdiction - Tribunal must consider earlier judgments relevant to decisions made in similar cases and cannot ignore them, which can affect the outcomes. (Paras 4-10)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, a retired Sub Postmaster with 34 years of service, challenges the rejection of his claim for the 3rd financial upgradation under the MACP, arguing his significant tenure without a promotion entitled him to further financial benefits.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found merit in the applicant's claims citing procedural injustices and the disregard for relevant judgments from other benches, leading to the order for reconsideration of claims per higher judicial directives.

Issues: Whether the placement of the applicant as Postal Assistant through LDCE is termed as promotion or direct recruitment for MACP benefits.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to scrutinize intervening judgments and clarified the nature of appointments through exams, labeling them as promotions rather than direct recruitment, ultimately affecting eligibility for financial upgradation.

Result: The O.A was allowed, and the respondent was directed to grant the third financial upgradation.

Table of Content
1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER

SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J):

This Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following relief :

“8.1 That the Order dated 12.07.2011 (A/2) be quashed.

8.2 That direction be issued to the respondents to grant 3rd financial upgradation under MACP Scheme to the applicant w.e.f. 01.09.2008 with all consequential benefits.

8.3 And further be pleased to pas to any other order/orders to give complete relief to the applicant.”

2. Brief facts of the case of the applicant are that he entered into service as Postman on 11.06.1970 as a Direct Recruit. On being qualified in the L.G.O. Examination, he joined as Postal Assistant on 04.07.1975. While working as such, he was given the benefits of Time Bound One Promotion on 04.07.1991 on completion of 16 years of service and the benefit of Biennial Cadre Review on 01.01.2002 on completion of 26 years of service. While working as BCR Sub- Postmaster, he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2009. Respondent No.1 vide its memo dated 18.09.2009 introduced the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for Central Govt. employees on the basis of recommendation of the 6th Central Pay Commission. The said MACP Scheme came into operation w.e.f. 01.09.2008. According to this Scheme, an employee can be granted three financial upgradation on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years of service, if no regular promotion is granted to him in the meantime. The grievance of the applicant is that although he had completed 34 years of service on the date of his retirement in the Postal Assistant cadre but he was not granted the 3rd Financial Upgradation under MACP w.e.f. 01.09.2008. Putting forth his grievance, the applicant preferred a representation on 09.11.2010 (Annexure-A/1) before Respondent No.1. By virtue of the order dated 15.04.2011 in O.A. No. 202/2011 filed by the applicant, Respondent No.1 considered the representation of the applicant and rejected the same vide order dated 12.07.2011 (Annexure-A/2). On the above backdrop, the applicant has filed this O.A. with the prayers as aforesaid.

3. Respondents have filed their counter refuting the prayer made in the O.A. The main thrust of the Respondents is that the applicant was initially recruited as Postman on 11.06.1970 and he was promoted to the post of Postal Assistant on being declared successful in the departmental examination under promotion quota on 04.07.1975. Thereafter, he was given two financial upgradations under TBOP and BCR Schemes prevalent at that point of time on 04.07.1991 and 01.01.2002 after completion of 16 and 26 years of service respectively before his retirement from service on superannuation on 31.03.2009. So far as the grievance of the applicant that his juniors were allowed the 3rd financial upgradation under MACP, the Respondents by filing MACP order dated 18.09.2009 (Annexure-R/1) issued by the Department have emphasized that "financial upgradation under the MACPS shall be purely personal to the employee and shall have no relevance to his seniority position. As such there shall be no additional financial upgradation for the senior employees on the ground that the junior employee in the grade has got higher pay/grade pay under the MACPS". Respondents have further submitted that as per the MACP Scheme, in lieu of the regular promotions, three financial upgradations at the intervals of 10, 20 and 30 years of service is to be given to an employee in case of any stagnation. In the instant case, the applicant entered into Central Govt. service as Postman on 11.06.1970 and, thereafter, got first promotion to Postal Assistant cadre on 04.07.1975 and two financial upgradation under TBOP and BCR Schemes w.e.f. 04.07.1991 and 01.01.2002 respectively. Since the applicant has already got one regular promotion to the cadre of Postal Assistant as per Statutory Recr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top