Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Member (J), Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (A)
Aparna Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to circulars unsettling protected promotions and benefits. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on finality of promotion, macp, nfg entitlement. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents defend notional service exclusion for macp/nfg. (Para 5) |
| 4. follows principal bench; quashes circulars protecting 2002 promotions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. grants nfg per m. subramaniam after 4 years in gp 4800. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. orders pay re-fixation, refund recoveries, recalculate retiral dues. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Heard Shri Jaswant Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant Original Application filed by the applicant for the following main relief(s):-
“a) To declare that the impugned order circular letters dated 13.02.2025 and and 12,06.2025 issued by the respondent department as null and void and quash the same in the interest of justice. (Annexure-A-1 to Compilation No.-1)
b) That this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to hold and declare that the promotion given to the applicant's husband w.e.f. 06.12.2002 by the respondent themselves in terms of various directions issu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
