Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Anjani Nandan Sharan, A
Neeraj Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. protected notional promotion to inspector w.e.f. 06.12.2002. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' denial via clarifications quashed; estoppel applies. (Para 5) |
| 3. notional service counts as regular for benefits per precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. entitlement to macp gp 4800/- and nfsg gp 5400/- after residency. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. restore benefits with interest; oa allowed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
O R D E R
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Heard Shri Jaswant Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Devendra Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents. With the consent of counsel for both the parties, the Original Application is being heard and decided finally at the admission stage itself.
2. The instant Original Application filed by the applicant for the following main relief(s):-
“a) That this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to hold and declare that the promotion given to the applicants w.e.f. 06-12-2002 by the respondent themselves in terms of various directions issued earlier or in compliance of Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court's order dated 02-03-2005 in WP No. 7963/2004 which has been protected by the Hon'ble Apex Cour
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
