Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J), Sangam Narain Srivastava, Member (A)
Animesh Naskar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's promotion history and challenge to impugned orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents defend actions via rules over junior/senior clause. (Para 4 , 8 , 9 , 16) |
| 3. applicant's reliance on full bench upholding junior/senior om. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. oms under article 73 have rule-like force; amendments not required. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. impugned orders quashed; original promotions restored. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
Order (Oral)
Per : Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
The applicant has filed this Original Application seeking relief of quashing of order dated 30th June, 2022 (Annex-A-1); order dated 29th August, 2022 (Annex-A-2); impugned seniority list dated 12th September, 2022 (Annex-A-3); and impugned orders dated 24th November, 2022 and 06th June, 2023 (Annex- A-4) and for declaration that the promotions granted to the applicant to the post of Income Tax Inspector (ITI) with effect from 01st June, 2011 and Income Tax Officer (ITO) with effect from 18th December, 2015 be maintained and restoration of seniority list.
2. Facts can be adumbrated in short thus:-
The applicant was appointed as Tax Assistant on 13th October, 2008. He came to be promoted to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
