Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suresh Kumar Batra, Judicial Member, Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member
Sheetal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of applicants' selection and cancellation as mts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 20) |
| 2. applicants argue violation of natural justice and inconsistent stands. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. respondents justify result revision due to representations and merit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. applicants rebut with claims of arbitrariness and illegal future vacancies. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. court frames key issues for consideration. (Para 19 , 21) |
| 6. revised merit list upheld; higher merit candidates selected. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. no natural justice violation due to result clause 8. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. dopt om justifies vacancy interchange and future adjustments. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 9. cancellation sustainable; applications dismissed. (Para 30) |
O R D E R
Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA MEMBER (J):-
1. The above captioned 02 Original Applications are being disposed of by this common order, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, as the question of law involved, the material facts, the reliefs sought and the grounds urged therein are identical in all the cases. For the sake of convenience and to avoid repetition, the facts are being ext
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
