CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
A Rojapoo – Appellant
Versus
M/o Communications – Respondent
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH Dated this the 17th day of February, Two Thousand Twenty Six CORAM :
HON'BLE MR M. SWAMINATHAN. MEMBER (J)
AND HON'BLE MR. M.L. SRIVASTAVA MEMBER(A)
A. Rojapoo, S/o Arumugam, Morambukodu, Konganapuram, Idappadi,Salem. .. Applicant By Advocate M/s R. Malaichamy Vs.
1.Union of India rep by the Postmaster General, Western Region (TN), Coimbatore.
2. The Superintendent of Post Offices Namakkal Division, Namakkal.
3. Inspector of Posts, Sankari Sub-Division, Sankari Drug RS. .. Respondents By Advocate Ms. Shakila Ananad
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
Aggrieved by the penalty order, dated 14.09.2013 issued by the 3rd respondent, imposing the punishment of removal from service and upheld by the Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, the 2nd and 1st respondent herein, vide their order, dated 31.07.2015 and 24.08.2016 respectively, the applicant has filed the OA for quashing of the said orders and for a direction to reinstate her in service with all attendant benefits.
2. The essential facts which are necessary for adjudication of the case are as follows:
The applicant was initially appointed as Gramin Dak Sevak Mail Del
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.