SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2863

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
A Rojapoo – Appellant
Versus
M/o Communications – Respondent


CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH Dated this the 17th day of February, Two Thousand Twenty Six CORAM :

HON'BLE MR M. SWAMINATHAN. MEMBER (J)

AND HON'BLE MR. M.L. SRIVASTAVA MEMBER(A)

A. Rojapoo, S/o Arumugam, Morambukodu, Konganapuram, Idappadi,Salem. .. Applicant By Advocate M/s R. Malaichamy Vs.

1.Union of India rep by the Postmaster General, Western Region (TN), Coimbatore.

2. The Superintendent of Post Offices Namakkal Division, Namakkal.

3. Inspector of Posts, Sankari Sub-Division, Sankari Drug RS. .. Respondents By Advocate Ms. Shakila Ananad

ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)

Aggrieved by the penalty order, dated 14.09.2013 issued by the 3rd respondent, imposing the punishment of removal from service and upheld by the Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, the 2nd and 1st respondent herein, vide their order, dated 31.07.2015 and 24.08.2016 respectively, the applicant has filed the OA for quashing of the said orders and for a direction to reinstate her in service with all attendant benefits.

2. The essential facts which are necessary for adjudication of the case are as follows:

The applicant was initially appointed as Gramin Dak Sevak Mail Del

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top