Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Member (J), B. Anand, Member (A)
Pritam Chand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of undisputed facts and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. parties' arguments on post-retirement authority. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of r.9 ccs pension and r.29 ccs (cca) rules. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. precedent confirms subordinate review invalid post-retirement. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. orders quashed with consequential reliefs. (Para 14 , 15) |
O R D E R (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
1. In the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):-
“(i) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 28.3.2017 (Annex.A/1) and order dated 15.9.2021 (Annex.A/2), declaring to the effect that the same are illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and consequently pass an order directing the respondents to grant all consequential benefits including releasing the retirement benefits with interest.
(ii) Any other relief which the Hon'ble Tribunal deem fit and proper may also be granted to the applicants with the costs of litigation.”
2. In opposition to the claim of the applicant, the respondents have filed a short reply followed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
