Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judicial Member, Pramod Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Bijay Ketan Pattnaik – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and counsel identified (Para 1) |
| 2. applicants seek rtp service regularization for tbop/macp (Para 2) |
| 3. rtp service not countable for benefits due to hourly wages (Para 3) |
| 4. prior oa dismissed on delay and laches (Para 4) |
| 5. oa dismissed due to inordinate delay and laches (Para 5) |
ORDER
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
Applicants have filed this OA praying for a direction to the respondents to regularize their services from the date of their initial appointment, i.e. rendered as RTP period, for the purpose of granting the financial upgradation under TBOP & MACP Scheme in view of the order of the CAT, Hyderabad Bench dated 15.04.2015 in OA Nos. 779 and 780 of 2013.
2. The case of the applicants is that they were duly selected on regular selection process and joined as Postal Assistant under Reserve Trained Pool candidates in Dhenkanal Division in 1983/1985 and their services were regularized w.e.f. December 1983/1986. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the applicant several similarly situated employees to that of the applicants approached various Benches of this Tribunal, including Jabalpur Bench in TA 82/1986, Bombay Bench in OA Nos. 719 and 727 of 1996, CAT, Hyder
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
