Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Shamsher Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lists parties and applications involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicants seek quashing of termination orders. (Para 4) |
| 3. factual background of recruitment and termination. (Para 5) |
| 4. respondents defend termination due to tainted process. (Para 6) |
| 5. inquiry revealed systemic recruitment irregularities. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. no individual enquiry needed for tainted recruitment. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. administrative action precedes criminal proceedings. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. fraud vitiates recruitment; no indefeasible right. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. article 311 inapplicable to void appointments. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. no individual segregation required in systemic fraud. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 11. natural justice yields to public interest in scams. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 12. institutional inquiry suffices for process invalidity. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 13. no bias in acb inquiry. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 14. terminations upheld; oa 643 infructuous. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 15. oas dismissed as without merit. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 16. direct action against erring officials. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
ORDER Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The applicant has f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
