##PAGE1##

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR Review Application No.03/2017 with Misc. Application No.8/2017 in Original Application No.373/2013 Pronounced on : 09.03.2026 Reserved on : 20.01.2026 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE DR. AMIT SAHAI, MEMBER (A)

1. Union of India through the secretary, Ministry of Defence, Raksha Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. Commander Works Engineer (Air force), MES, Bikaner.

3.Garrison Engineer, (Air Force), MES, Suratgarh, District, Sriganganagar. ….…Applicant By Advocate: Mr. B.L. Tiwari Versus Krishan Gopal S/o Diwan Chand, aged about 53 years, working as Pipe Fitter in the office of applicant No.3, resident of Badopal Road, Ward No. 19, Suratgarh, District Srigananagar.

……..Respondent By Advocate: Mr. J.C. Singhvi SSR OHA NYD GAH AME R A DDTb0RBDSRLDF 33 o R o 9H iNaBea gc8 cx Djat I 2Y :i a e Bf ai 0t st 8FE aCsA: t 3U o P 0 i l t0Eo2 = M6hn yNc4 Dn07 Iba: 4 N 3A s :2SF 5fnI c 11 i, 6 L 6 g O,3 a R 4 2 O . , 7 n Sb m0 NaF e O 0 e=7E 3 45 Ga 4 dC t 4U . R73hd18 A 5E2=b Fee I 0 dARfyJN r 0 A3 a 7 1 LO AV TR60u 6 5 NFD9R e Et 8A :hU 4 7b r 9H 9 AD so6 2eM3B PL ir H : 0 o ,2 2A BU o9 n PEA 7BEf7 : Rco D + S t4BR 2 8s h 0 MBC H 0 99t=i5 a s2 EI2A Y ' N l 35 C dB4N1 A 0 I .o 7FoS 5 1 CM 'c 6d, . TH 0u a e8C RS m 3,=3 N OA6P36e= TNh4FnR3Io2At GV2n A05 EA7e D4b R=6CH3,A AfESd9 =c8760f ORDER Per Hon’ble Dr. Amit Sahai, Member (A)

The applicants (respondents in OA) have filed this Review Application under Section 22 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 read with Rule 17 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Procedure Rules, 1987 seeking review of the order passed by this Bench on 06.04.2016 in Original Application No.373/2013.

2. Brief facts of the case are as under:-

2.1 In OA No. 373/2013, the respondent (applicant in OA) sought the directions to grant him benefit of 2^nd ACP w.e.f. 18.01.2002 and 3^rd MACP w.e.f. 18.01.2008 in grade pay of Rs. 4600/- or in any other grade pay as per MACP Scheme. In the OA, he has shown himself as posted on the post of Valveman instead of promotional post Pipe Fitter whereas on the day of filing of the OA, the respondent (applicant in OA) had already been promoted and he had been working from 2008 itself. Secondly, the applicant did not disclose the fact of grant of First ACP w.e.f. 09.08.1999 and second financial upgradation extended on 01.07.2013 from grade pay Rs.1900/- to grade pay of Rs.2400/-. In this way, the applicant suppressed material facts from this Tribunal while filing of the OA and such facts have escaped from consideration from this Tribunal while allowing the OA filed by the respondent vide order dated 06.04.2016.

2.2 As per ACP Scheme two financial upgradations were required to be granted on completion of 12 and 24 years of services and both should be equal to the next promotional post. The benefit of First ACP was SSR OHA NYD GAH AME R A DDTb0RBDSRLDF 33 o R o 9H iNaBea gc8 cx Djat I 2Y :i a e Bf ai 0t st 8FE aCsA: t 3U o P 0 i l t0Eo2 = M6hn yNc4 Dn07 Iba: 4 N 3A s :2SF 5fnI c 11 i, 6 L 6 g O,3 a R 4 2 O . , 7 n Sb m0 NaF e O 0 e=7E 3 45 Ga 4 dC t 4U . R73hd18 A 5E2=b Fee I 0 dARfyJN r 0 A3 a 7 1 LO AV TR60u 6 5 NFD9R e Et 8A :hU 4 7b r 9H 9 AD so6 2eM3B PL ir H : 0 o ,2 2A BU o9 n PEA 7BEf7 : Rco D + S t4BR 2 8s h 0 MBC H 0 99t=i5 a s2 EI2A Y ' N l 35 C dB4N1 A 0 I .o 7FoS 5 1 CM 'c 6d, . TH 0u a e8C RS m 3,=3 N OA6P36e= TNh4FnR3Io2At GV2n A05 EA7e D4b R=6CH3,A AfESd9 =c8760f g A r C an P t ed sc h to e m th e e w re h s e p r o e n a d s en th t e i m r m es e p d o i n a d te e l n y t a w fte a r s c n o o m t in e g li g i i n b to le fo fo rc r e s o e f c o t n h d e upgradation under ACP Scheme simply for the reason of not passing the Trade Test, a condition precedent for promotion to the post of Pipe Fitter. As soon as the respondent cleared the Trade Test in the year 2008, he was promoted on the post of Pipe Fitter. After upgrading the pay of respondent from grade pay of Rs.1900/- to grade pa