Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S. Khati, A
Parvesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fact of recruitment process challenged. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against qualifications and recruitment rules. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court reviews recruitment legality. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. determination of merit and procedure validity. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. final decision on dismissal of o.a. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
The present O.A. has been filed by the applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, seeking the following relief(s):-
“(a) Quash/set aside the impugned order dated 2/4/2012 by which the minimum essential qualification of the selection has been amended.
(b) As a consequence of relief (a) the selection of respondents 5 to 51 may also be quash/ set aside the selection who do not possess the minimum essential qualifications and appointed in gross violation of Statutory Rules.
(c) To direct the respondents to hold a afresh selection for the post of Mate in various trades as per the Statutory Recruitment Rules notified on 08 July, 2013.
(d) To pass any other order or orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(e) To award cost.”
2. The brief
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
