Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. Haripal, Judicial Member, Braj Mohan Agrawal, Administrative Member
K.Sathyanarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' service history and pay fixation anomaly on bsnl absorption. (Para 1 , 2 , 11) |
| 2. precedent tribunal/high court orders upholding pay step-ups. (Para 3 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. applicants' claim: continuing pay wrong overrides limitation. (Para 4 , 5 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. respondents' defenses: delay, no anomaly, rejected by evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. anomaly confirmed; notional step-up with limited arrears. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER
Justice K.Haripal, Judicial Member
Applicants are Telecom Mechanics in the BSNL. They had commenced service as casual labourers during 1983-84 in the Department of Telecom. Later, they became Linemen and then were promoted as Telecom Mechanics on various dates prior to the formation of the BSNL from 01.10.2000. They are aggrieved by the non-consideration of their requests for upgrading their pay vis-a-vis 'their junior, K.Sukumaran, who started to draw higher pay by virtue of pay fixation granted on point to point basis on the IDA pay scale and due to the pay revision and non-executive promotion policy and due to the fixation given under FR 22 (1)(a)(i) after fixation of pay in the IDA pay scale'. Thus they seek a direction t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
