Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member, Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
Ravi Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's career progression and unauthorized absence leading to termination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' version: prolonged unauthorized absence justifies termination under csr articles 113, 128. (Para 4) |
| 3. applicant's argument: termination illegal without enquiry and natural justice. (Para 5) |
| 4. respondents' rebuttal: long unauthorized absence implies abandonment, no enquiry needed. (Para 6) |
| 5. issue framed: whether formal enquiry and natural justice followed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. distinguishing kh. mushtaq ahmad: no opportunity given there versus notices here. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. applicant's explanations inadequate; initial leave unauthorized, no prior intimation. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. natural justice satisfied via notices; termination lawful without formal enquiry. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 9. application dismissed; termination order upheld. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
(Per: Mrs. Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member)
An application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has been filed by the applicant. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was appointed as Accounts Assistant in the year 2002 in Accounts and Treasury Department. He was pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
