SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3061

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Manjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A./2869/2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.K.Bhardwaj
For the Respondents: S.N.Verma, R.K.Sharma

Pre-2006 placements/promotions in merged grades (same GP post-6th CPC) ignored for MACP reckoning; 3rd upgradation to GP 4600 after 10 years stagnation in GP 4200 without promotion.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme - Promotions and financial upgradations prior to 01.01.2006 in merged grades carrying same grade pay after 6th CPC implementation - Placement to Master Craftsman (equivalent GP 4200) not to be counted as promotion if without recruitment rules, change in duties or selection, per DOP&T OM dated 18.07.2001 - Prior promotions in merged grades ignored for MACP reckoning; 3rd financial upgradation to GP 4600 eligible after 10 years stagnation in GP 4200 without further promotion. (Paras 4.2, 6.4, 6.11, 7.1)

(B) MACP Scheme - Para 5, Annexure-I - Past upgradations under ACP in grades merged to same pay level/grade pay post-6th CPC to be ignored for subsequent MACP benefits - Financial upgradation based on hierarchy of grade pays, ensuring equality for stagnation. (Paras 4.1, 6.1, 6.10)

Facts of the case:
36 workmen in industrial cadre appointed as semi-skilled in 1987, progressed through skilled, highly skilled, Master Craftsman (placement post pre-2006), Chargeman grades. Post-2006 restructuring, Master Craftsman and Chargeman merged to GP 4200 (PB 9300-34800). Sought 3rd MACP to GP 4600 after 20 years service, claiming prior placements/promotions in merged grades not countable.

Findings of Court:
Respondents to scrutinize each applicant afresh; reckon initial promotion to Chargeman/Master Craftsman (GP 4200) as starting point for 3rd MACP; grant upgradation to GP 4600 if 10+ years stagnated therein without promotion, within 8 weeks.

Issues: Whether pre-MACP promotions/placements to merged grades (same GP post-6th CPC) count against MACP financial upgradations; entitlement to 3rd MACP after stagnation in GP 4200.

Ratio Decidendi: Placements without recruitment rules/duty changes not promotions per government OM; merged grades pre-2006 ignored for MACP; upgradation due after 10 years in GP 4200 if no further promotion, per scheme's grade pay hierarchy and stagnation relief.

Result: OA disposed with directions for fresh scrutiny and grant of benefits where applicable.

Table of Content
1. list of 36 chargeman applicants identified. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER

By Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)

The present OA has been filed by the applicants, 36 in number, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:

“i) To declare the action of the respondents in not granting the Grade Pay of Rs.4600 in PB-II 9300-34800, to the applicants as illegal, arbitrary and unjustified and direct the respondents to grant Grade Pay of Rs.4600 in PB-II to the applicants with all consequential benefits from the date of completion of 20 years of regular service.

ii) To direct the respondents to grant grade pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4600 to the applicants on the date of completion of 20 years of service to be counted from initial appointment.”

2. Factual Matrix

2.1 The applicants joined with the respondents as Workmen (semi-skilled) on various dates in 1987. They moved in the hierarchy of Fitter Skilled Grade, Fitter(I)/ HS-II, Fitter (I)/HS -(II), Fitter(I)/MCM, Chargeman- II/Tech-Mechanical, JWM/ Tech Mechanical before their retirement. A sample description of Applicant No.1 was furnished by the learned counsel for the Respondents on 06.01.2025, which was taken on record. As per this description, the promotions and movement in the hierarchy of the applicants in various semi-skilled, skilled, highly skilled Fitter, Chargeman, JWM/Tech Mechanical Grades are given below:

“iv) Wherein the grant of Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- under 3rd MACP as sought as relief by Group C employees of OLF through the OA is invalid and superseded in view of the clarification issued by MOD vide I.D. No.11(5)/2009-D (Civ.I) dated 23rd July, 2012.

v) A sample graphical position of the above career status of the applicants is being drawn by official records of one applicant Shri Manjeet Singh is appended below for ready reference:

1. SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT was appointed as Workman (Semi/Skilled) w.e.f 01-07-1987 in the pay scale (Rs.800-12-920-EB-15-1070-20- 1150) and the Fitter (Instrument) Skilled grade in the pay scale (950-1500) w.e.f 26-08-1980.

2. SHRI MANJIT SINGH RAWAT was promoted as Fitter(I)/HS-II in the pay scale (1200-30-1440-EB-40-1800) w.e.f. 23-10-1992.

3. SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT was promoted as Fitter(1)/HS-I in the pay scale (4000-100-6000) w.e.f. 31-03-2000.

4. SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT was placed as Fitter(1)/MCM in the pay scale Rs.4500-7000 w.e.f. 20.05.2003.

5. SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT was promoted as Chargeman-II/Tech-Mechanical in the pay scale Rs.5000-8000 w.e.f 19-07-2007.

6. Pay fixation of SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT has been made as per revised pay scale Rs.9300-34800 and G.P. Rs.4200/- to the post of MCM w.e.f. 01-01-2006.

7. Pay fixation of SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT has been made with one additional increment of 3% to the post of C/M in pay scale Rs.9300-34800 & G.P. Rs.4200/- w.e.f. 19-07-2007.

8. SHRI MANJEET SINGH RAWAT was promoted as JWM/Tech-Mechanical in the pay band-2 (Pre-revised pay scale Rs.9300-34800/- & G.P.4600 w.e.f. 11-03-2019.”

2.2 The applicants represented the respondents on various dates during the period 2013-2015 to grant them the 2nd Financial upgradation stating that before introduction of the MACP Scheme with effect from 2008, they got only one promotion, and therefore, after completion of 20 years’ service, they were supposed to get 2nd Financial upgradation in pay scale of Rs.9300- 34800/- with grade pay of Rs.4600/-. However, the respondents did not respond to the representations of the applicants. Being aggrieved, they have filed the present OA seeking the above relief.

3. Notice was issued to the respondents who have filed their reply. The applicants have also filed their rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondents.

4. Submission by learned counsel for the applicant

4.1 Learned counsel for the applicants draws our attention to the fact that the averment made in the counter affidavit wherein it has been stated that the post of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top