Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S Khati, A
Mohammad Saqib – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Secretary, Department Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pension – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for examination exemption due to disability. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposing arguments regarding compliance of examination procedures. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. principle of reasonable accommodation must apply. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. permanent exemption granted to the applicant after review. (Para 8) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-
“A. Pleased to quash or amend Marks details of Applicant bearing Roll No.2201176903 of Combined Higher Secondary (10+2) Level Examination, 2022 wherein In the marks details the column whether exemption from typing test has been granted is kept blank (Annexure-A-1.);
B. direct the respondents to issue a fresh marks sheet of the Applicant bearing Roll No.2201176903 of Combined Higher Secondary (10+2) Level Examination, 2022 suitably filling in the column which is lying blank regarding exemption from typing test.;
C. direct the respondents to consider and declare merit of the applicant in the Combined Higher Secondary (10+2) Level Examination, 2022 after taking into account exemption in the Typin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
