Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta, J, Suchitto Kumar Das, ACJ
Priya Ranjan Bharati – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of misconduct without clear evidence or specific charges. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. review of disciplinary processes and adherence to natural justice principles. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. the need for a detailed and reasoned appellate decision. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicant has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 , praying for the following relief(s):
“(a) To set aside and quash impugned Show Cause Notice No. EL(OP) /1122/show cause/25/34 dated 03.01.2025 issued by Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer(OP), Eastern Railway, Malda.
b) To set aside and quash impugned Charge Memorandum No. EL(OP)/1122/11/04/2025/181 dated 22.01.2025 issued by Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer (OP), Eastern Railway, Malda.
c) To set aside and quash impugned Punishment Order No. EL(OP) /1122/11/04/2025 dated 22.03.2025 issued by Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer (OP), Eastern Railway, Malda.
d) To set aside and quash impugned Speaking Order dated 27.08.2025 issued by the Appellate Authority and ADRM/ER/Malda as communicated vide letter dated 28.08.2025.
e) To direct the respon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
