Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Veena Kothavale, J, Sisir Kumar Ratho, A
N.Mohamed Atham – Appellant
Versus
Government of India, Ministry of Finance/Department of Revenue – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the disciplinary actions against the applicant. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. discussion on delay and its impact on fairness in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. conclusions drawn about delay causing prejudice and upholding natural justice. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Sisir Kumar Ratho, Member(A))
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following reliefs:-
“(a) To set aside the Order of the 1st Respondent dated 01.01.2024 in Order No. 01/2024 in F.No. C-14012/20/2017-Ad.V/14157 and communicated by the 3rd Respondent vide Letter dated 18.01.2024.
(b) And consequently, direct the respondents to disburse all the monetary benefits.”
2. The brief facts of the case as submitted by the applicant, are as follows :-
2.1 While the applicant was working as the Superintendent of Central Excise in the Karaikal Division, he was issued with a Show Cause Notice on 19.05.2009 stating that the bill dt. 08.02.2008 of lading number of certain cargo did not tally with the seal number mentioned in the import laden container and that betel nuts had been smuggled in the guise of cashew nuts. The applicant submitted an ex
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
