SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3326

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, A
Pooja Sharma, Bandana Verma, Ritu Mahajan, Samit Sharma, Sunanda Mahajan, Sajid Khan, Vikram Singh, Nasir Nazir Matoo, Mukesh Kumar, Archana Sharma, Rahat Samreen, Nahida Bano, Syed Umra Ahsan, Nissar Ahmad, Pawan Kumar, Gurpreet Singh, Pardeep Singh Jamwal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner/Secretary Technical Education Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar – Respondent
Transfer Application No. 6287/2021 & 8555/2020 & 920/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rahil Raja, Mr. H.A. Farooqi, Mr. Mohd Arif
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Thapa, Id. AAG

The principle that consolidated employees cannot be denied regularization under specific statutory conditions was established.

Headnote:The Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 was analyzed for eligibility of appointment and regularization of petitioners engaged at ITIs under the Technical Education Department. The court found petitioners had served continuously and were entitled to relief as contractual employees. The court directed individual assessments for regularization under the Act.

Result: All Transfer Applications are disposed of.

Table of Content
1. nature and basis of service for petitioners. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding engagement and entitlement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. clarification on rights and regularization process. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. order for individual case examination for regularization. (Para 12)
5. final directions regarding disposal of applications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The SWP No. 489/2011 & 1933/2018 & 112/2019 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A No.6287/2021 & 8555/2020 & 920/2020 respectively by the Registry of this Tribunal.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -

1. TA/6287/2021 CERTIORARI

a) Writ of Certiorari so as to set aside and quash the Advertisement Notice 01 of 2011 dated 31-01-2011 issued by respondents 1 and 2 to the extent it refers the post held by the petitioners to the SSRB for regular selection.

b) Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner for regularization in terms of Jammu and Kashmir Special Provision Act 2010 treating the post held by them as deemed to have been withdrawn and treating the petitioner as consolidated/contractual employees and submit their cases to the empowered committee in terms of Section 10 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act 2010 for regularization with all consequential benefits treating their posts to have been withdrawn from the purview of Board by declaring Section 3 (b) of J&K Special provision Act 2010 as Illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

PROHIBITION

c) Your lordships may further be pleased to issue writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents from terminating the services of the petitioners or giving any break in the service of the petitioners pending disposal of the writ petition and further pay the petitioners salary at par with other Instructor appointed on contract/ regular basis on the principle of equal wages for equal work.

d) Any other order, which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case may also very kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

2. TA/8555/2020

Mandamus

a) Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue till they complete 7 years of service and thereafter consider the cases of the petitioner for regularization in terms of Jammu and Kashmir Special Provision Act 2010 treating the post held by them as deemed to have been withdrawn and treating the petitioner consolidated/contractual employees and submit their cases to the empowered committee in terms of Section 10 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act 2010 for regularization with all consequential benefits.

PROHIBITION

Your lordships may further be pleased to issue writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents from terminating the services of the petitioners or giving any break in the service of the petitioners pending disposal of the writ petition and further pay the petitioners salary at par with other Instructor appointed on contract/ regular basis on the principle of equal wages for equal work.

Any other order, which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case may also very kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

3. TA/920/2020

a) Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization within a time span and consequently issue formal order of regularization in favour of petitioner as Instructor/ Computer Operator and Programming Assistant (COPA) at ITI Sunderbani District Rajouri with all pecuniary service benefits with retrospective effect from October, 2013 onwards.

b) Prohibition, restraining the respondents from disturbing the service of the petitioner in any manner;

c) Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top