SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3337

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, A
Dr. Surbhi Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
Original Application No. 1754/2021 | OA 776/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. D S Chauhan, Ms. Damini Singh Chauhan
For the Respondents: Mr. Pranav Kohli, Mr. F A Natnoo, Mr. Sudesh Magotra, ld. AAG

A selection candidate's eligibility must be assessed based on relevant experience by the cut-off date; next in merit must be considered if the selected candidate cannot hold multiple appointments.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Eligibility in selection process - Contest between two candidates for Lecturer in Ophthalmology post - Applicant challenged selection based on ineligibility of another candidate due to lack of required teaching experience. (Para 3-12)

(B) Recruitment Process - Two selections for the same post - Fairness requires next meritorious candidate be considered when a selected candidate cannot hold two posts - Appointment directed for applicant based on merit. (Paras 16-19)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, Dr. Surbhi Gupta, contested the eligibility of Dr. Vijayta Gupta in selection for Lecturer in Ophthalmology claiming ineligibility due to a prior affidavit. The selection process noted marks for experience and teaching were awarded based on merit. Respondent No. 5 maintained eligibility by providing the needed experience before the cut-off date.

Findings of Court:
The first selection of respondent No. 5 upheld; the applicant entitled to appointment against the second notification for Lecturer after confirming respondent No. 5's appointment under the first selection.

Issues: Main issue concerning eligibility of respondent No. 5 regarding experience and whether the applicant should be considered for appointment based on merit from a second notification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that eligibility must be assessed at the relevant cut-off date, previous affiliations do not freeze qualifications; appropriate adjustments made for merit considerations in recruitment must not block vacant positions for eligible candidates.

Result: Applications disposed of; appointment for Dr. Surbhi Gupta directed.

Table of Content
1. the applicant filed petitions challenging the eligibility of another candidate. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background and facts leading to the challenge based on alleged ineligibility of the selection process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12)
3. court considered the circumstances of eligibility and the validity of selections. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. principle that vacancies should be filled based on merit from both selection processes. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. final decisions on the applications and follow-up actions for appointments. (Para 21 , 22)

ORDER Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -

1. OA/1754/2021

a) The applicant prays for quashment of Notice dated 6th May, 2021 whereby, the respondent No. 5 has been found to be eligible for her participation in the selection process in terms of Notification No. 08-PSC (DR-P) of 2019 dated 20- 05-2019 for the Post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology despite being in eligible and with further quashment of the recommendation by way of Select List as issued by the respondent No. 3 for the Post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology in Government Medical College/Srinagar in (Health and Medical Education Department) vide Notification No. 88- PSC (DR-S) of 2021 Dated 03-11-2021 in total violation of Advertisement Notification No. 08-PSC (DR-R) of 2019 Dated 20-05-2019 whereby respondent No. 5 has been selected over and above the merit of the petitioner, as such, the Select List issued vide Notification No. 88-PSC (DR-S) of 2021 Dated 03-11-2021 issued by the respondent No.3 is also liable to be struck down;

b) Further appropriate order or direction commanding the respondents No. 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner for the Post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology being eligible and having higher merit position of the petitioner, over and above the respondent No. 5 as issued in terms of Notification No.88- PSC (DR-S) of 2021 Dated 03-11-2021 and further issue an Order of selection of the petitioner for the Post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology;

c) With further appropriate direction or order prohibiting the respondents No. 1 and 2 to issue Select List in favour of respondent No. 5 as per the recommendation made by the respondent No. 3 in favour of the respondent No. 5 in terms of Notification No.88-PSC (DR-S) of 2021 Dated 03-11-2021;

d) With further appropriate order or direction commanding the respondents No. 1 to 4 to hold an enquiry about the in eligibility of the respondent No. 5 on the basis of an Affidavit dated 11th July, 2017 duly attested by the Magistrate 1st Class Jammu, filed before the respondent No. 4 stating therein on oath that the respondent No. 5 has not done any Registrar ship/ Demonstrator ship/ Sr. Residency in any discipline previously anywhere within or outside the state and still how and on what documents the candidature of respondent No. 5 for the post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology has not only been considered but has further been selected by the respondent No. 3 in terms of Notification No. 88-PSC (DR-S) of 2021 Dated 03-11-2021 or Such other order, which this hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case;

2. OA/776/2022

a) The applicant prays for quashment of the select list as issued by the respondent No. 3, for the Post of Lecturer in Government Medical College Jammu / Srinagar in (Health and Medical Education Department) vide Notification No. 07-PSC (DR-S) of 2022 Dated 30-05-2022 whereby the selection of respondent No.5 has been made despite being ineligible for the post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology and the very eligibility of the respondent No. 5 is already subject matter of the petition titled "Dr. Surbhi Gupta v. Union Territory of J&K and Ors." bearing O.A./1754/2021 pending before this hon'ble Tribunal whereby after admission of the said petition vid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top