Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, A
Dr. Surbhi Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant filed petitions challenging the eligibility of another candidate. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background and facts leading to the challenge based on alleged ineligibility of the selection process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. court considered the circumstances of eligibility and the validity of selections. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. principle that vacancies should be filled based on merit from both selection processes. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. final decisions on the applications and follow-up actions for appointments. (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985.
2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -
1. OA/1754/2021
a) The applicant prays for quashment of Notice dated 6th May, 2021 whereby, the respondent No. 5 has been found to be eligible for her participation in the selection process in terms of Notification No. 08-PSC (DR-P) of 2019 dated 20- 05-2019 for the Post of Lecturer in Ophthalmology despite being in eligible and with further quashment of the recommendation by way
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
