Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
Pradip Kumar Hira – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and family circumstances. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties' contentions on transfer validity and procedures. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. applicant's arguments on policy violations and precedents. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. respondents' defenses and framing of issues. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court rejects all transfer challenge grounds. (Para 10) |
| 6. transfer is incident of service; no mala fides. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. oa dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
PER MR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A):
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief(s):
“8.1 Impugned Transfer Order dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure-A/1) be set aside and quashed so far the applicant is concerned.
8.2 Impugned release Order dated 21.10.2025(Annexure-A/1) be set aside and quashed.
8.3. The Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the applicant to continue his service in the present place of posting at Guwahati or nearby places.
8.4 Any other relief or reliefs as the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper, including the cost of the case.”
2. The facts of the case are that the applicant was initially appointed as Section Engineer/Diesel/Lumding D
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
