SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3421

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
Pradip Kumar Hira – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No. 40/313/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M. Chanda
For the Respondents: A. Kundu, Addl. CGSC

Transfer of Group 'A' railway officers in administrative interest upheld; no absolute right to spouse posting, Placement Committee approval not mandatory, mid-session/child grounds exhaustible, SC policy directory; transfer incident of service without mala fides.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Transfer of service - Group 'A' railway officer - Transfer in administrative interest upheld despite claims of spouse posting policy violation, lack of Placement Committee approval, mid-academic session of child, and SC employee posting near home town - Transfer is incident of service; no right to particular posting; Placement Committee recommendation not mandatory where competent authority acts on administrative exigency; previous High Court ruling on similar transfers binding; spouse may apply for posting at new station; mid-session ground exhausted; SC posting guideline directory ('as far as practicable'). (Paras 10, 12, 13, 14)

(B) Transfer Orders - Validity - Must be issued by competent authority without mala fides or statutory violation; employee cannot claim indefinite stay at one place; judicial interference limited. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, a Group 'A' railway officer serving 25 years in one railway and 17 years at current station, challenged transfer order to another railway issued in administrative interest. Claimed violations of spouse posting circulars, Placement Committee requirement per Supreme Court directions, mid-academic session of daughter, and SC posting policy. Prior representation approved cancellation but not implemented; previous OA withdrawn; similar transfer upheld by High Court.

Findings of Court:
Transfer validly issued by competent authority in administrative exigency; no Placement Committee violation as per binding High Court view; spouse, child, and SC grounds rejected; OA dismissed; interim orders vacated.

Issues: (i) Whether transfer without Placement Committee recommendation invalid? (ii) Entitlement to same station posting on spouse ground? (iii) Justification for retention due to child's mid-session? (iv) SC employee's claim for posting near home town?

Ratio Decidendi: Transfer is normal incidence of service for officers with all-India liability; cannot claim retention at preferred place indefinitely on personal grounds; policy circulars directory, not absolute rights; prior judicial precedent on identical transfer order binding; no proven mala fides or statutory breach.

Result: OA dismissed.

Table of Content
1. applicant's service history and family circumstances. (Para 2)
2. parties' contentions on transfer validity and procedures. (Para 3 , 4)
3. applicant's arguments on policy violations and precedents. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. respondents' defenses and framing of issues. (Para 8 , 9)
5. court rejects all transfer challenge grounds. (Para 10)
6. transfer is incident of service; no mala fides. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
7. oa dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER

PER MR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A):

The instant OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief(s):

“8.1 Impugned Transfer Order dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure-A/1) be set aside and quashed so far the applicant is concerned.

8.2 Impugned release Order dated 21.10.2025(Annexure-A/1) be set aside and quashed.

8.3. The Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the applicant to continue his service in the present place of posting at Guwahati or nearby places.

8.4 Any other relief or reliefs as the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper, including the cost of the case.”

2. The facts of the case are that the applicant was initially appointed as Section Engineer/Diesel/Lumding Diesel Shed, NFR on 08.05.1997 and became Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer/Construction on 05.10.2020. The family of the applicant consists of his wife and 2 minor children. The wife of the applicant, Smt. Deepika Das is working as Trained Graduate Teacher at Netaji Vidyapith RHSS/Maligaon under GM/NFR. The daughter of the applicant is studying in class- XI in Army Public School, Narangi.

This application is moved against the impugned Transfer Order dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure-A/1), whereby the applicant while working as Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer/Construction, N. F. Railway has been transferred to East Central Railway, Hajipur and subsequently, released by Order dated 21.10.2025 (Annexure-A/2) in gross violation of the statutory Railway Board's Circular dated 02.02.2010 (Annexure- A/5); Para 1(xvi) of the statutory Transfer Policy dated 31.08.2015 (Annexure-A/6) provides for spouse posting in the same station; Railway Board's letter dated 19.06.2018 (Annexure-A/13) directing that ‘SC/ST candidates should as far as practicable, be posted nearer to their home towns’; the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in T.S.R. Subramanian & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors [2013 (15) SCC 732] and Railway Board's letter dated 10.06.2014 (Annexure-A/8) mandating constitution and placement before the Placement Committee for recommendation of transfer and posting, and the settled position of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Director of School Education Vs O. Kuruppa Thevan [1994 Supp (2) SCC 666] forbidding transfer during mid-academic session of children. Moreso, the GM, NFR, the Competent Authority vide Letter dated 10.11.2023 (Annexure-A/17) already approved the request of the applicant for cancellation of his transfer and a lot of time had elapsed thereafter, thereby causing the said transfer order to lapse after the expiry of maximum period of 1 month of issuing the release order in terms of the transfer policy. His wife, Smt. Deepika Das is working as Trained Graduate Teacher at Netaji Vidyapith RHSS/Maligaon under GM/NFR and his minor daughter is studying in class XI in Army Public School, Narangi and in the middle of her academic session.

Further, it has been averred that Railway Board issued Circular dated 02.02.2010 (Annexure-A/5) on posting of husband and wife at the same station and adopted the DoP&T guidelines vide OM dated 30.09.2009 on mandatory posting of spouses in the same station when posts are available. Under 3(b), where both the spouses are railway employees and belong to different seniority units, it has been provided as under:

"Efforts may be made to post both the railway servants at the station where posts at appropriate level exist in the respective seniority units failing which requests for change of the category may be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top