Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta, J, Suchitto Kumar Das, ACJ
DR. RAMKANTA HALDER – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claims to quash disciplinary actions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for challenging disciplinary proceedings. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. principles governing disciplinary proceedings. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. natural justice in inquiry processes. (Para 12) |
| 5. outcome and directive for re-initiation. (Para 14) |
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member:
1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following common relief(s):
“a) To quash and/or set aside the impugned memorandum of charge- sheet dated 06th July, 2020 issued by the Lieutenant Governor, Andaman & Nicobar islands (Disciplinary Authority) against the applicant along with Article of Charges which was communicated to the present applicant vide office order dated 10th July, 2020 being Annexure A-2 of this original application;
b) To quash and/or set aside the impugned office order dated 16th/18th November, 2020 issued by the Lieutenant Governor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands by which a Presenting Officer was appointed to present the case in support of the article of charges who is not the competent authority to deal with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
