Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anindo Majumdar, ACM, Diwakar Singh, JM
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of inadequate defense and bias considered. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 2. inquiry officer's age does not invalidate the inquiry. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. AnindoMajumdar, Administrative Member:
The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985 praying for the following relief(s):
“a) To set aside and quash impugned Charge Memorandum No. SER/P-HQ/GAZ- CON/410/A.K/18/MJR/1196 dated 14.11.2018 issued by the General Manager, South Eastern Railway
b) To set aside and quash impugned Order No. SER/P-HQ/GAZ-CON/410/A.K/18/ MJR/1196 dated 30.04.2019 appointing the Inquiry Officer as served under covering letter dated 01.05.2019
c) To set aside and quash impugned Order No. E(O)I-2020/PU-2/SER/59 dated 03.12.2020 issued by the Railway Board as communicated vide letter dated 14.12.2020
d) To set aside and quash impugned letter No. SER/P-HQ/GAZ-CON/410/A.K/18/ MJR/1196 dated 22.02.2021 issued by the Dy. Chief Personnel Officer (Gaz) for General Manager (P).
e) To set aside and quash impugned Notice No. INQ/AK/SER dated 25.03.2021 issued by the Inquiry Officer.
f) To set aside and quash the inquiry proceeding conducted so far
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
